An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
Now-a-days due to increase in the number of quacks or the fraud Doctors, and so many Scandals and worst cases taking place in the world all this have made an adverse impact on the lives of people. Many doctors just keep patients hospitalised for the sake of money and provide improper procedure for diagnosis. So I agree with the recommendation that the ailing patient should have easy access to the record of treating similarly afflicted patients.
As the ailing patient would have an access to the record he would able to know how much the doctor is effectively treating various patients and what are the various medicines and the therapy which one would be required to have during diagnosis. If the time required for the patient to recure well is more he might change the doctor and go the doctor who is specialized in treating the patients and has overall good results. As the number of patients are growing in day-to-day life many hospitals have various doctors and the time given by the specialised doctor is quite low so the ailing patient should be aware of it, and in the cases of diagnosis such as Blood cancer or the Bypass Surgery of the heart one should have the proper record of the doctor who is specialised in these field as a slight mistake in the treatment might lead to a life of a patient.
In today's world many relatives prefer having a family doctor and always take his advice for going any treatment under any other doctor. But we directly go the doctor as suggested to us without giving a second thought, but it might be possible that the doctor is not good enough or requires wholesome amount for the treatment. So if the patient is admitted and has access to doctor's record he might verify how much it would cost and how much time it would take him to heal and what all procedure would take place one by one and would be mentally ready for those and would feel safe enough that he is not being cheated and would cure in sometime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- The Sociology Department of State University has been receiving negative comments about its program from employers of the graduates of its department. As a result of these negative comments, the department has come to the conclusion that its graduates ar 66
- Childhood is the happiest time of a person's life 60
- Scholarship 76
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ep patients hospitalised for the sake of money and provide improper procedure for...
^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ts. As the ailing patient would have an access to the record he would able to know how...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e directly go the doctor as suggested to us without giving a second thought, but ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'second', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215846994536 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.172131147541 0.157235817809 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0956284153005 0.0880659088768 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0409836065574 0.0497285424764 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0355191256831 0.0444667217837 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120218579235 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0573770491803 0.0406280797675 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.35564089299 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0273224043716 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.122950819672 0.0997080785238 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0437158469945 0.0249443105267 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0218579234973 0.0148568991511 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1962.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 354.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54237288136 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.319209039548 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.19209039548 0.280924506359 68% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.129943502825 0.200843997647 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0706214689266 0.132149295362 53% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35564089299 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 219.290929204 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463276836158 0.48968727796 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.6460287325 55.4138127331 86% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6194690265 44% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 39.3333333333 23.380412469 168% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.1379317145 59.4972553346 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 218.0 141.124799967 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.3333333333 23.380412469 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 58.5423728814 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.58241758242 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398917669011 0.391690518653 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.201527363765 0.123202303941 164% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.111748991543 0.077325440228 145% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.665746175936 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156831338756 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228993245199 0.161403998019 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139822241763 0.0892212321368 157% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.534773341669 0.385218514788 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.078078319717 0.0692045440612 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308593640497 0.275328986314 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954999235234 0.0653680567796 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.