All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Organizations are always in the pursuit to enhance themselves to sustain in a competitive market. Whether it is about financial, working or strategic aspects, companies are always working hard to give their best to their employees and to their customers.
Many companies hire external consultants who are not a part of the organization, but have great ability on how to improve the operations efficiently. These consultants suggest various new ideas and strategies that aid employers to boost their business. Therefore, the consultants play a vital role as they bring in their profound knowledge and give towards the growth of the organization. There are many instances wherein organizations had to hire external consultants to save their debt-ridden business. For example, in the year 2005, there was a great economic depression which struck the United States and its waves spread across global financial markets. In order to survive the economic storm, H&B Global had to hire consultants from Shaolin Corp to devise strategies to survive the financial crisis. This helped H&B Global to stabilize and become one of the leading companies towards the end of the decade.
However, it is also said that the employees are the well-wishers of their organization and would always strive to work for their company's success and well-being. Therefore, it is crucial to understand employee's concerns and suggestions. As employees work within the organization and understand the organization's strength's and limitations, there are in a better capacity to advise their employers as compared to the external consultants. Companies should spend more time and save the money spent on external consultants by listening to their own employees as it will be more beneficial.
To conclude, organizations can take consultation from external entities. However, the consultation should be minimum and only to the extend that is required. Instead, suggestions received from employees will be of a great help to companies to prosper in a ever-competitive market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 130, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sultation should be minimum and only to the extend that is required. Instead, suggestions ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 134, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[2]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...ation should be minimum and only to the extend that is required. Instead, suggestions ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ired. Instead, suggestions received from employees will be of a great help to com...
^^
Line 13, column 232, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'company'.
Suggestion: company
...m employees will be of a great help to companies to prosper in a ever-competitive market...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 256, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a great help to companies to prosper in a ever-competitive market.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47634069401 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14888129861 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511041009464 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4664692128 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.5 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319479713449 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100349071063 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926387832296 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180357372111 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573151940254 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.