All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is correct to say that companies can save on money as well as improve their performance if they start listening to their employees rather than hiring outside consultants to suggest measures to take to improve their company's performance. That is because employees have spent enough time in the company to recognize the flaws and can suggest ways to overcome those knowing the culture of the company. Hiring consultants from outside can be helpful as they can see things from another perspective without having any bias towards the company but their suggested measures can be impractical as they have a little knowledge of company's culture than the employees. Therfore, it is better to have periodic feedback from the employees rather than hiring consultants from outside of the company.
As the employees spent an average of 8 hours in the office where they have to communicate with other employees from their department and many other departments so their brain makes an impression of the way how other people in each department works. Based on their experience with that department, consciusly or unconsciously, they create an image in their brain about the strengths and weaknesses of other colleaguesin their department and the other departments. So, they can suggest in a better way knowing the company's culture how their department and the other departments can improve to work in a more efficient way.
Hiring an outside consultant is also a good idea as they are not part of the company and they do not hold any biases towards anyone so they can suggest in a subtle way without speaking in favor or aginst anyone. This can be a good idea but it also has a drawback. Considering the emerging idea in the work culture where employers try to accomodate every employee in order to gain greater benefit of having him loyal to the company, it can have somewhat negative impact towards the employees' performance. If you try to impose some idea on any of the employee who is not used to work in that way can hinder his progress. So, it is better to have his/her colleague to provide feedback on his/her work so that it can be a healthy discussion on how to improve efficiency rather than being bossy and ordering him to work in a certain way.
It can be safely said that a company can save time and money both if they start listening to their employees rather than hiring outside consultants to give feedback on the work. Because employees spend more time at workplace and they have direct communication with colleagues in their department as well as employees in other departments so they can suggest in a better way considering the work culture and nature of that employee. Hiring outside consultnts can be beneficial as they are specialized individuals in this field and they can suggest efficient ways to improve performance but their suggested measures can have a drawback that they have little knowledge of the work culture than the employees of the company. So, companies should start listening to their employees instead of hirning consultants from outside.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 54
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a subtle way" with adverb for "subtle"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ases towards anyone so they can suggest in a subtle way without speaking in favor or aginst any...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ve somewhat negative impact towards the employees performance. If you try to impose some ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pact towards the employees performance. If you try to impose some idea on any of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 519.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91714836224 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74489324252 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.362235067437 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7697544673 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.5 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4375 23.4991977007 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267980545143 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126705045487 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730264287675 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197440102052 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730290607164 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.