Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The given argument talks about the deaths by cow flu and a method to prevent it. The argument suggests that a large number of lives can be saved by routinely administering the inoculations against cow flu to all the people where the disease is detected. However, there is a possibility that a person will die as a result of inoculation so the routine administrating of inoculations agaisnt cow flu cannot be permitted.
The argument can be strengthened or weakened if we have a clear evidence of number of deaths that were caused as a result of cow flu where inoculation were administered and where it was not adminitered over a period of time. The statistics showing the number of deaths can suggest if the routine administration of inoculation against cow flu should be permitted or not. If the ratio of deaths by the disease by flu to the deaths where inoculation was administered is significantlly large than inoculation should be permitted. However, if this is the other way round thn inoculation should not be permitted.
Some evidence or experimental results is also needed that provides informatin abouton the number of lives saved and number of people who died where inoculations agaisnt cow flu were administered to people. This can be done by having two groups of the people who have caught the disease. One experimental group whose people have been administered inoculations routinely whereas the other group that is placebo. After comparing the results, if the experimental group has lower number of deaths than the placebo group than it will strengthen the argument that inoculations against cow flu should be routinely admnistered.
However, the people in the placebo and experimental group should be as similar as possible which means that the number of people having that disease and the number of people who have not yet caught the disease should be the same. Moreover, the severity of the disease and their living patterns should be as similar as possible to get as accurate results as possible. Otherwise, we may get a positive result for our experimental group but that may not strengthen the argument considering that the placebo and the experimental group varied significantally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 54
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... prevent it. The argument suggests that a large number of lives can be saved by routinely adminis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...and where it was not adminitered over a period of time. The statistics showing the number of d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nst cow flu should be permitted or not. If the ratio of deaths by the disease by f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 364.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06043956044 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03970822744 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.376373626374 0.468620217663 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 598.5 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2619667952 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 119.503703932 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.324526521 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.70786347227 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422463326143 0.218282227539 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183380125319 0.0743258471296 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115031542247 0.0701772020484 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305171173571 0.128457276422 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122468280398 0.0628817314937 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 98.500998004 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.