All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
I completely agree with the statement that hiring external consultants is an effective way for companies to operate more efficiently.
Sometimes a third person's opinion might give a different outlook to the perspective. This is true in this case. A consultancy firm looks at the working and functioning of the company from an impartial and unbiased view, which could provide a fresh perspective. This could help in improving the performance of company. Various companies like Deloitte, McKinsey have become Fortune 100 companies because many companies in the world value this fresh perspective of the third party.
These consultancies not only provide suggestions but also provide solutions to integrate their suggested changes. This reduces the workload of the hiring company and hence, makes the process of improvisation effective. The companies offer a range of solutions varying from technical, analytical to business and market analysis. The systematic and methodological approach of these consultancies helps in careful breakdown and analysis of the problem, which generally is a humongous task for the hiring company.
Moreover, it is not true that all the suggestions provided by the employees are for the improvement of the organisation.Sometimes certain suggestions from the employees would be in their own selfish interests and not in the benefit of the company. This could prove to be a problem for the company as it results in a massive waste of both time and human workforce.
Thus, sometimes outsourcing a difficult problem is a better solution than trying to tackle it alone.
Hence, many companies prefer to hire consultancies for improving their organisational and production capabilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 83
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
- In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e more efficiently. Sometimes a third persons opinion might give a different outlook ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Sometimes
...for the improvement of the organisation.Sometimes certain suggestions from the employees ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, moreover, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 263.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52091254753 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2777562074 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7792114144 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361529657014 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112868807774 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969519461765 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191935976431 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106236260808 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.