Although innovations such as video, computers, and the internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Many would say that the recent development of internet technology hampers students’ learning. In some sense, students are more susceptible to distractions because of the innovations. However, I still believe that we cannot easily ignore the benefits from improved methods for instruction.
Of course, it is undeniable that students can be distracted a lot from computers and smartphones they have. Teachers have regulated internet usage in the classroom in order to keep students’ attention on lecture. Nowadays, we can easily observe students in the subway, cafe, and road who keep eyes on a smartphone. Thus, no one can easily impugn that internet technology impedes students’ best learning.
Despite the negative side-effect, I believe innovative technologies can be wisely used to increase learning efficiency. Students can keep their concentration on a video clip because it conveys information in an interesting way. Moving pictures, narrative, and sound effects are integrated into a single video and help better understanding for learners. In fact, tons of scientific research already proved the increased learning ability of students when using video materials. In this regard, computers and the Internet can refine a traditional learning environment using textbooks.
Moreover, educators can give various learning materials to students, thanks to the Internet. Educators simply search on the Internet and find useful things such as videos, blogs, and research papers. They no longer need to concoct all class materials themselves. All they have to do is search on the Internet and select apt information for their students. In this way, teachers not only save time but also be able to provide high-quality out-of-class materials to students.
In sum, I think students benefit from high-technology devices because they enable us to search useful knowledge what class cannot fully cover. Also, fascinating visuals provided by the internet attract students’ attention and make students entirely into what they are studying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | AC1990 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | AC1990 | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | m_cobanera@yahoo.com.ar | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Isabella1027 | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | mors | 50 | view |
- Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
- read 73
- All college students should take a public speaking course that teaches how to speak well in front of many people before graduation. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...best learning. Despite the negative side-effect, I believe innovative technologies can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an interesting way" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...deo clip because it conveys information in an interesting way. Moving pictures, narrative, and sound ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, i think, in fact, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70779220779 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1138699586 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0170740812 60.3974514979 30% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5263157895 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17524082184 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577831988576 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366862274326 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101550226869 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042437193223 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.