Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The leader of an organization is the one who brings the whole organization together. It is important for the leader to maintain the respect of his or her peers, but lacking sound moral judgment will only bring about major problems for the organization in the long term. I believe that having a sound moral judgment should take precedence over the leader being able to maintain the respect of his or her peers for the two reasons discussed below.
The leader of an organization is required to make good judgments on a day to day basis and the members of his organization are required to respect his decisions. Now, if the members of the organization lack trust in their leader, it not only makes it more difficult for them to abide by his decisions but also decreases their efficiency dramatically. Hence one could say that gaining the respect and trust of his or her colleagues should be of primary to a leader. But it shouldn't come at the cost of lacking sound moral judgment, because this would only lead the initially trusting and respectful colleagues to lose their trust over time.
On the other hand, consider a leader who has sound moral judgment but lacks the trust of his peers, to begin with. He will not produce good results initially as his peers doubt his decisions and are not willing to work in the direction he suggests. But eventually, people will start to notice his capability and start trusting him more. In the long term, he will be able to build a trusting and respectful environment where everyone can give their best.
One might say that if the leader lacks his peers' trust the organization will most likely fall apart even before he has a chance to gain their trust. But that is not generally true in practice. A good leader has to have sound judgment and he will eventually gain the trust of his employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 63
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ecreases their efficiency dramatically. Hence one could say that gaining the respect ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...hould be of primary to a leader. But it shouldnt come at the cost of lacking sound moral...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, as to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68615384615 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5682632909 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458461538462 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.228001156 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3222738733 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129257295056 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956521438141 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219852782227 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108417455558 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 100.480337079 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.