Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
An effective leader is not only defined by his actions and judgements, but also how revered he is among his peers. An effective leader not only takes moral decisions but is also respected by his followers for it.
An important characteristic of a leader is how well he uplifts himself and his team along with him. His team looks upon him, and it vital that he has the ability to maintain the respect of his peers. A leader loses his power the moment his own peers hold no respect for him. It is important that he not only considers the morality of the judgement, but also thinks about how it will be viewed by his peers. A leader who has lost all respect in the eyes of his peers is no leader at all. For the team to heed to his decisions, they must first respect him as a person. If they don't consider with him with any regard, then they will not follow his decisions with any seriousness. I'd like to give the example of Mahatma Gandhi ji, who effectively lead India to her path to freedom. It would not have been possible if the people of the country had no respect for him. If it weren't for the respect he earned, they wouldn't have taken his preachings of a practise called 'Ahimsa' seriously, a practise which played a great role in helping India breaking free from her chains.
In the path of a leader, there will be many situations which will challenge him to take tough moral decisions. Some of these will not be accepted by many. It is such times which define how efficient a leader is, by his ability to reason with his peers, to make them understand the various reasons behind such tough decisions. It will be near to impossible to reason with a person who has no respect for him, which will only lead to his efforts being futile and will lead to his unpopularity in his own team. Respect plays a big role in the career of a leader. He should be able to arrive upon the best possible judgements at the same time consider how it will project him to his own peers and followers.
A leader is greatly defined by how he is viewed as among his peers. Respect is the most important aspect defining a leader, without which a leader is insignificant
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...espected by his followers for it. An important characteristic of a leader is...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... first respect him as a person. If they dont consider with him with any regard, then...
^^^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...low his decisions with any seriousness. Id like to give the example of Mahatma Gan...
^^
Line 5, column 870, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...e country had no respect for him. If it werent for the respect he earned, they wouldnt...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 909, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... werent for the respect he earned, they wouldnt have taken his preachings of a practise...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39303482587 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38481459654 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440298507463 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5182366349 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336613528676 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130482491074 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899200873857 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258621237688 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754284039278 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 12.1639044944 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.