In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the field of endeavor, often people get discouraged if they don't see noticeable progress for a long time. At this time past achievements within that field play an important role. Past accomplishments is an inspirational source for people who are working hard to achieve their goals in the same field. It is true in the fields. All the famous people in the world are inspired by someone in the field who is more successful.
We all know about Facebook CEO, Mark Zakenbarg. He is one of the inspiration for many young businessmen. While working on to make company worldwide, he faced many problems. He always mentions that he is inspired by Steve Jobs, Apple Inc. CEO and Warren Buffet.
In the field of science, Scientists are working on making time machine from many years, they got very minimal success till today, but they are never discouraged to quit. One main thing which is working as a basis of their experiments and encouraging them is Albert Einstein's work in the same field. He designed theories to work on this experiment at the time when it was hard to imagine this kind subject, and his achievements are influencing the work on modern scientists.
Thus, to start any endeavor it takes courage and after past achievements in the same field act like catalyst and help to continue working despite of all the disappointments. So, I agree with the argument that it is not possible to make significant contribution without getting influenced by past achievements in the same field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to 50
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the work on modern scientists. Thus, to start any endeavor it takes courage a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91015625 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92631837526 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58203125 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6086125457 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215141126636 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707569856384 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853580581101 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137320794673 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102317369202 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.