In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being influenced by past achievements within that field
Throughout our human history we learn from our past mistakes or results, from the abortive results we learn our fault and that leads towards the fortuitous result. So, in any field of endeavor, it is important to consider past achievements and influenced by them.
Primarily, past incidents taught us the failures and the where we fail, from the faults we improvised ourselves. For example, when someone writing a scientific paper or article they have to briefly go through the past studies relevance with the topic, that helped them to find the area of research. Besides, the significant contribution cannot be made if we ignore the past achievements and past studies. There is gradation or steps that helped us climbing bottom to top. For example, a student can not write an articulated essay if he or she do not know basic words or sentence. Similarly, without past studies, we can not go further.
Past achievements did not earn randomly, the elders work hard and their faults and results taught us and influenced us for being consistent on a field of work where we try to be successful. Thomas Edison failed a thousand times before creating a bulb. When people asked him about why he failed, he replied, he does not fail thousand times, discover a thousand ways how to not discover bulb. Another example, without the help of past achievements our modern technologies can not revolutionize. If Einstein and Newton did not contribute to the field Stephens Hawkins could not discover the theory of everything, or we could not know the blac kholes. Similarly, if Galileo did contribute then we might not know about the gravity.
On the other hand, many people argued that past achievements are not always important. There is always the first time. Someone always there to try something new and might not have a reference. This might be true that someone starts a trend or topic but there is always some sort of reference. For example, when Newton discovers gravity he may not have the direct reference, but he had mathematical reference to solve the problem.
At the epilogue of this topic, I would say that, If we try to successful we cannot ignore past incidents. History influenced us and without the past, we can not build the present.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leads towards the fortuitous result. So, in any field of endeavor, it is importan...
^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'writes'.
Suggestion: writes
...ed ourselves. For example, when someone writing a scientific paper or article they have...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'studies'' or 'study's'?
Suggestion: studies'; study's
...hey have to briefly go through the past studies relevance with the topic, that helped t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to climb' or 'climb'.
Suggestion: to climb; climb
...re is gradation or steps that helped us climbing bottom to top. For example, a student c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...write an articulated essay if he or she do not know basic words or sentence. Simil...
^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...he failed, he replied, he does not fail thousand times, discover a thousand ways how to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, briefly, but, first, if, may, similarly, so, then, for example, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87696335079 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70595675652 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510471204188 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3838839446 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7142857143 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235347725987 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775893607584 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947486983191 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126693774208 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444749178014 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.