In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
In our everyday life, we see people with innovative ideas or maybe we come up with a new idea each day, but a few of us are persistent enough to follow that idea and proliferate those ideas. However, it seems that young people come up with new ideas more frequently and more unusual ideas, but coming up with an innovative and applicable idea seems to require experience in addition to just a raw idea. I personally believe, every one may achieve the experience to realize and idea but it is a fresh and unbiased mind of young people that actually makes a contribution worthwhile and feasible.
First and foremost, the most significant characteristics of contributors is that their minds are not biased meaning that they do not follow what have existed for so long. In other words, contributors do not assume a predefined rule for the problem they face. For instance, when most people easily accepted that ground vehicles should have four wheels to be stable, an innovative mind sought alternative solutions that have resulted in motorcycles and Segways that are considered as major innovations in transportation.
Furthermore, contribution in any form, from technological to literature, requires high risk taking attitude. Fear of not being accepted by the public has always been an indispensable thought of any contributor. However, beginners, because of their ambitious attitude, are more willing to explore new ideas; whereas, experienced individuals tend to preserve their achievements and not to jeopardize them. As a salient example, neither Steve Jobs (the founder of Apple) nor Elon Musk (the co-founder of Tesla Motors) took high risk decisions when they became experienced in their own field. However, this is because of their risk taking attitudes in their early adulthood that we have high-tech smart phones in our hand while relaxing in a self-driving car.
Nevertheless, no one could deny the fact that innovative mind has only been trained with numerous failures and valuable experiences in the past. No one buy an innovative idea just because it is new and no one else has given a thought to that, rather that idea should be feasible, and this can be achieved only after untiring perseverance and hard work. The idea of Anti Break System in cars that save many lives around the world has been achieved after years of experience with deficiencies of traditional systems and examining different scenarios though which a reliable breaking system can be obtained.
To summarize, contribution before experience requires novel ideas that only pop ups in the mind of people who has fresh mind who think outside of the predefined boxes which is more prevalent in the youth.
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In d 54
- Teachers’ salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 66
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 58
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview."When the Grandview Symphony was established ten years ago, the city of Grandview agreed to provide the symphony with annual funding until the symphony became self-sustaining 54
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 595, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a contribution worthwhile and feasible. First and foremost, the most significant...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231732776618 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.164926931106 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104384133612 0.0880659088768 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.062630480167 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0417536534447 0.0444667217837 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125260960334 0.12292977631 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0501043841336 0.0406280797675 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88757325418 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0229645093946 0.030933414821 74% => OK
Particles: 0.0062630480167 0.0016655270985 376% => OK
Determiners: 0.0814196242171 0.0997080785238 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125260960334 0.0249443105267 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0208768267223 0.0148568991511 141% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2690.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09977324263 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.337868480726 0.366273622748 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256235827664 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206349206349 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147392290249 0.132149295362 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88757325418 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541950113379 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 63.5208611516 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 29.4 23.380412469 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6906790076 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.333333333 141.124799967 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 23.380412469 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.674092028746 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 55.0235827664 51.4728631049 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.51162790698 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266773116128 0.391690518653 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146667392605 0.123202303941 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0991112167606 0.077325440228 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.601741498563 0.547984918172 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158856231271 0.149214159877 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117337993337 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575342271081 0.0892212321368 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.214010937858 0.385218514788 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.026249926511 0.0692045440612 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182519389403 0.275328986314 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708977831059 0.0653680567796 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.