I strongly disagree with the above statement.
Human brain evolves with every passing moment. So it is natural that every person born a bit early than another person will be less smart regarding mental acumen. We all should know that repository of inventions - of scientific or of non-science fields- are built up from years of researches made by persevering researchers from different races, religions and countries. A beginner who comes with fresh eyes and mind, high-level of energy, is totally unaware of the amount of cerebration, sweat, blood and hours spent by his predecessors for a particular research topic. His enthusiasm can be compared to a kid who has started learning rhymes in a school. The vigor with which a beginner lands into a scientific or any other research, makes him think about the problem-solving from a new perspective. But there is no guarantee that his ideas are novel enough to stand the test of time. Whoever working before him were not mere ordinary men that their work will go down history as not cutting edge ones. Every software build today is built upon previously existing ones . It is not so easy to deliver new ideas everyday and prove it every other day. Otherwise numbers of nobel prize winners would have gone beyond thousands every year.
Keeping in mind that with the passage of time many previously unsolvable scientific puzzles become solvable due to subsequent development of other scientific issues, we cannot only glorify the researchers who won accolades working on ideas which emerged from their predecessor's brain. It was not only their talents and sweat which earned them the prizes. Rather, it was other contemporary inventions and thought processes going across the scienticfic community at that time, which empowered them with the technological knowhow and knowledge base, thereby reach the goal(example integrated circuit and microchip fabrication) and thus contributing more statistically by getting their names enlisted in the hall of fame.
So both new and old researchers, existing and non-existing should be given equal credit and respect when it comes to the issue of their contributions in their fields.
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g mental acumen. We all should know that repository of inventions - of scientific...
^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... religions and countries. A beginner who comes with fresh eyes and mind, high-le...
^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... beginner who comes with fresh eyes and mind, high-level of energy, is totally u...
^^
Line 3, column 1022, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'builds'.
Suggestion: builds
...s not cutting edge ones. Every software build today is built upon previously existing...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1072, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y is built upon previously existing ones . It is not so easy to deliver new ideas ...
^^
Line 3, column 1114, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... It is not so easy to deliver new ideas everyday and prove it every other day. Otherwise...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1153, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... everyday and prove it every other day. Otherwise numbers of nobel prize winners would ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s going across the scienticfic community at that time, which empowered them with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21714285714 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8346066455 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648571428571 0.4932671777 131% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.9008055199 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099732742986 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337594231427 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425673541924 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704069877321 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475422115645 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.