Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The most-known of leaders throughout history are those who have had strong and dogged idealogies. These are the leaders who amass a huge number of followers for their cause and bring through revolutions. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the prompt that a leader who is influenced easily by shifts in popular opinion will not bring about much change due to two reasons.
A leader who is too quick to be influenced by public opinion will not have a fixed public following who are loyal to him/her. History shows that leaders with unchanging purposes and fixed opinions are the ones who gain the most following. These leaders use their pertinacious idealogies to convince people and make people change their allegiances. Such strong connection between the leader and the followers makes sure that the organizations qualms are heard and changes are brought about.
A leader who had no fixed opinions would be no better than a common man. If a leader were to be swayed by public opinion he/she would only lose the trust of the public since they may be going back on certain idealogies that they may have once supported. The public is also easily influenced by various factors like media, social circle, news etc. The leader who is swayed by public opinion would only be letting himself/herself be swayed by the factors that affect public opinion.
One may argue that a leader with extreme opinions could sway the public to support them in large numbers and influence law making in an inimical way but this is where the factors that affect public opinion such as media and social circles come in. If the actions are not corresponding to the well being of the public, surely the public would not support the idealogies. Hence, I feel that a leader without strong idealogies would not accomplish very much.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rious factors like media, social circle, news etc. The leader who is swayed by pu...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inimical way" with adverb for "inimical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... large numbers and influence law making in an inimical way but this is where the factors that affe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, i feel, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8640776699 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49955536939 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508090614887 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9733801665 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16455824086 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705709396821 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573455088531 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119574736231 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507934246371 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rious factors like media, social circle, news etc. The leader who is swayed by pu...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inimical way" with adverb for "inimical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... large numbers and influence law making in an inimical way but this is where the factors that affe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, i feel, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8640776699 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49955536939 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508090614887 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9733801665 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.357142857 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16455824086 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705709396821 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573455088531 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119574736231 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507934246371 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.