In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view
Society is a collection of mass where everyone is inter-connected and inter-dependent. So, the progress of society means progress of everyone. To ensure an equal distribution of progress opinions from all sides should be considered. Hence, I strongly agree with the statement that progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of views.
First of all, most of the states of the world are democratic states where people are the source of power. That’s why people have their rights to express their opinion which may be contrasting. Otherwise, people will become powerless element of the society and their participation in the development will not occur. As a result, society will not progress in the balanced way. To ensure the balanced progress which will facilitate all the people of the society, discussion among people of contrasting point of views is required. For example, in parliament of the democratic states, ruling party and opponent party both have their rights to express their opinions regarding any development project of the country. Ruling party can’t execute projects with their own accord because it will jeopardize the democracy of the states.
Secondly, to make any effective and sustainable progress of the society contradictory views should be considered properly because it helps to find foibles of the current plans. For example, in Bangladesh traffic jam is a severe problem. To eradicate traffic jam government is constructing more and more roads and highways but this is not working well to solve the problems. A group of researchers suggested that only construction of more roads and highways is not enough to fight this problem rather mass transit such as train, metro, bus route should be improved and use of private cars should be discouraged by imposing extra fees. At first government didn’t pay heed to their suggestion but later understood that their suggestion was more effective solution than constructing more roads and highways.
Finally, to ensure the proper distribution of the progress in every parts of the society discussion among people of different views should be considered. Otherwise, people who will not be able to express opinions, will not be able to claim their needs. For example, in Bangladesh, minorities are unable to protest the tyranny that is going on them because leaders of the ruling party don’t pay heed to the complaints to satiate the majority. That’s why minor people of the society are deprived of their rights although there are lots progresses in various sectors of the country.
In summary, from aforementioned analysis and examples it is lucid that in any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of views.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-22 | shahajan999 | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | sazid | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places 54
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 66
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 66
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 60
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sses in various sectors of the country. In summary, from aforementioned analysis...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36073059361 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91734370074 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463470319635 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1355079858 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.80952381 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35207085896 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116737481808 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169820032518 0.0758088955206 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269500258562 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194719305988 0.0667264976115 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.