Because society is always changing, laws should always change to reflect the times as well. In addition, laws should be open to interpretation based on the facts of each individual circumstance.
Life has always been in stages, eras do come and go, people live and transient to the other world. but one thing is certain, there is always a regulation to guide the actions of people and how they relate with themselves. these laws can range from individual beliefs, known as principles, to societal code of conducts called ethics and to the larger group of people unified by a common factor; tribe, geographical location, nation etc. In spite of all these, it is important that societal law changes to reflect changes in times as well.
The world lived in decades ago was rudiment, devoid of any form of modern civilization and too basic to impose the rules of such a society in a technologically advanced nations like we have today. it is no gainsay to argue that rules were formed based on the happenings of the society and according to their level of civilization. With advancement in technological revolutions, it is vastly impossible to assume that the imposition and limitation placed by some rules in the early century should still be effective. As a very basic example, an average African would definitely prohibits his children from having anything to do with strangers at the wee hours of the day. The rule will definitely hold no water in the present days of having the world as a global village with no restrictions on the amount of interaction one can have with people of all race with the use of social media.
To further argue, the lack of proper education by majority of the early generations means a small group of people were deciding an organize form of laws that society follows. they are the ones to set the pedestal of what is generally tenable in the society in a system of government that is largely ruled by the few eminent learned personalities. this is in stack contrast to the current generation that have young brainy individuals that can push for change with laws that do no conform with thier ideology. this is even more achievable with a unified voice through the use of social media to push for reforms. Obviously, changes are inevitable to satisfy the tastes of the teeming population as a result of their exposure.
With all these, there are arguments that the law should be interpreted based on individual circumstances and condition. this will proof to be nothing but a farce. An inherent nature of human being is to antagonise things that are not in his favor. if law is to be treated based on individual circumstances, hardly could we have anyone charged guilty of any offense, since all offenders would always have a strong, compelling reason to back up his actions. these reasons might seem trivial and frivolous in the eyes of others, but going by the culprits perspective, it is not insignificant which shifts the power of the law to his sides. naturally, human biasedness is inherent in his creation.
In as much as the societal laws should change to reflect changes in the society, the basic fundamental laws to protect lives, property and sanity to be protected. if anything, they should not be made less of what was tenable in the years past. there should be a common ground for which laws should be spelt to guide against the fundamentals, the breach of which can be perilous to human lives. Instead, the laws relating to comfort of living, relationship with people, and all other form of 'secondary laws' should reflect the common belive of the society as it changes.
- Laws should reflect changes in society Laws should be interpreted based on an individual s circumstances 66
- Because society is always changing laws should always change to reflect the times as well In addition laws should be open to interpretation based on the facts of each individual circumstance 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n in stages, eras do come and go, people live and transient to the other world. b...
^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... live and transient to the other world. but one thing is certain, there is always a...
^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...le and how they relate with themselves. these laws can range from individual beliefs,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ly advanced nations like we have today. it is no gainsay to argue that rules were ...
^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'prohibit'
Suggestion: prohibit
...le, an average African would definitely prohibits his children from having anything to do...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s a small group of people were deciding an organize form of laws that society follows. they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...nize form of laws that society follows. they are the ones to set the pedestal of wha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... the few eminent learned personalities. this is in stack contrast to the current gen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...that do no conform with thier ideology. this is even more achievable with a unified ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...individual circumstances and condition. this will proof to be nothing but a farce. A...
^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...onise things that are not in his favor. if law is to be treated based on individua...
^^
Line 7, column 457, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...mpelling reason to back up his actions. these reasons might seem trivial and frivolou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 544, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'culprits'' or 'culprit's'?
Suggestion: culprits'; culprit's
...in the eyes of others, but going by the culprits perspective, it is not insignificant wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 638, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Naturally
...ifts the power of the law to his sides. naturally, human biasedness is inherent in his cr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...s, property and sanity to be protected. if anything, they should not be made less ...
^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... of what was tenable in the years past. there should be a common ground for which law...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, still, well, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 103.0 58.6224719101 176% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2836.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 593.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78246205734 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93473315629 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71761001537 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489038785835 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 903.6 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3875414406 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7083333333 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331381951512 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934867890664 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982059571759 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185079831122 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102270322847 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.