The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your

Essay topics:

The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

It is said that most of the time a passionate interest in commonplace things can form the best ideas. I agree with this point of view to some extent.
I can understand why many creative ideas come from simple or common things around us. The best examples for understanding of this argument are social networks. The founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg just create this social network based on the simple communication among people. The feeling of homesickness that many migrants had in the US help the Zuckerberg to program Facebook in order people to keep in touch with their family members or friends even they are far from each other without any expenses. In fact, the origin of Facebook’s creation is a simple thing related to ordinary communication among individuals. Most of the time, we have seen the relationships among people, but whether we have ever thought like Zuckerberg. No, because for us, the communication of people was not as interesting as it was for him. He just looked at the people and their simple needs and tried to obviate them.
We also only need to ask this question; how did Newton discover the gravity? The answer is just by falling down the apple from the tree. We all have many trees around us, we can find apple in the stores, gardens and so on. Even people in the past had this accessibility. But all of us did not have the passionate and accuracy of Newton. So, he could find some useful things about the earth and gravity in his time which can still be practical for us in the modern life for creation of different new things.
However, we cannot arrest that all the best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. For instance, the discoveries in space are very complex and perplexing, and people without any background in astronomical science cannot have good ideas related to stars, planets and galaxies. This is because, the data about the space is limited. All people cannot afford the travelling to the space. So, how do they can have any innovative idea about something that they do not even see?
In conclusion, in my view, many ideas originate from simple things around us but it is not true for all things. Also, discoveries from simple things need the accuracy, interest and perseverance of the person who finds them.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... the simple communication among people. The feeling of homesickness that many migra...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75879396985 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61795541661 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4951941926 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.347826087 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3043478261 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14122196647 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459889266524 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500096372057 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101216657248 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431080521654 0.0667264976115 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.