The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Consumer-generated wastes are among the leading causes of environmental problems such as flooding, environmental pollutions, as well as serving as reserviours for disease vectors. While the more feasible way to counter this concern is to restrict the amount of consumer-generated waste, this may not entirely be the best cause of action for several reasons.
A study carried out by the department of environmental safety at a University in Ibadan compared the effectiveness of waste disposal processes carried out individuals and disposal authorities. The result showed that disposal agencies had more efficient and environmentally safe methods of eliminating wastes. An example: a rural domestic household in the slums of Nigeria would rather dispose their refuse and sewage in a nearby stream or river. This clogs the river eventually leads to flooding and water pollution. This is mainly due to poor knowledge of waste disposal processes on the part of the households. Thus restricting the amount of trash to be collected by city from houses would only have a negative rebound effect as it would only further cause the people to dispose trash in more environmentally harmful processes; defeating the entire purpose of the recommendation.
Households are not the only sources or consumer generated wastes. A similar reaserch by the department of nutrition showed that majority of residents of Oyo state, Nigeria, prefer to eat their food as eatery and restuarants. There for in this instance, consumer waste would bee higher at this locations. Deciding to reduce the waste from households alone does not give a representative effect on the waste from eateries. This defeats the entire purpose to restricting waste generation by consumers.
Athough, it may be considered that limiting the amount of waste collected from households would improve their knowledge of waste recycling. This only holds true in climaxes where residents have adequate knowledge of waste disposal. For example, rural residents in the slums of Osun state, Nigeria, barely have enough academic education to for them to understand the importance of waste recycling.; talkless of the patients. They sould not understand he importance and the process. Rather they’d accumulate such wastes in their houses, breeding disease vectors and causing environmental pollution.
In summary, while restricting the amount of trash received from households would have significant effects on the limiting the amount of wastes generated by consumers, it is only observable in climes where residents are well educated on the effects of environmental pollution and how to properly dispose their wastes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs only apartment buildings that is buildings without elevators live an average of three years longer than do people who 88
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- As early as the twelfth century a d the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 87
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones In order to relieve Briggsville s notorious traffic congestion Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi million dollar subway system The subway will run through the major 60
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview Our citizens are well aware of the fact that while the Grandview Symphony Orchestra was struggling to succeed our city government promised annual funding to help support its 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nce, consumer waste would bee higher at this locations. Deciding to reduce the waste...
^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to for them to understand the importance of waste recycling.; talkless of the pat...
^^
Line 7, column 483, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...derstand he importance and the process. Rather they’d accumulate such wastes in their ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5243902439 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1251365229 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485365853659 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8702934376 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.210526316 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223857462523 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075302291748 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542989519582 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147856700946 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405377185741 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.