The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The recommendation presents the view that I would agree is successful most of the times but one I cannot fully support in or nothing impression is given by the statement.
Teaching is the prominent occupation which not only encompasses educating students but also the development of skills, personality development, and overall growth of students to contribute to the nation. Shaping the future of the children with an understanding of their abilities, a skill set that bolsters their confidence and eventually makes them a responsible and good human being.
Firstly, the first half of the statement is convincing and comprehending with the idea to educate children however, the second half as ignoring negative actions impacts more detrimental logic and sense in the first half of the statement. Praising someone for good work is always the best action as this can bolster the confidence and escalate positiveness in one’s behavior. For instance, if the teacher is teaching good etiquettes of the classroom like raising a hand before asking anything or addressing the class is good behavior and teacher should praise this to pass the message of manner and discipline in the students. Another habit like being on time or punctual is always conducive so actions or habits like this are laudable.
Secondly, praising will inspire others in the class to do good things and receive applause from others. This inspiration turns in to good manners and ethics that extrapolate as good human contributions to mankind. praiseworthy actions ameliorate good personality and confidence but executive praising sometimes can be dangerous. It can create a negative impact on other students who are not praised as more the others. Moreover, teachers should identify students who are attention seeker, and doing some actions for praise is also negative in some ways.
Moreover, ignoring the negative actions with detrimental to students' mentality as they might keep doing negative things and that can lead to worst. For example, if a student is misbehaving in the chemistry lab playing with chemicals and bully someone then the teacher should not ignore that and vituperate that child to retract the behavior.
To ignore the negative actions can allow the problem to persist one that leads to a bigger issue and myriad problems. I do, however, greatly support the statement that the central focus of education should be praising the children and encourage positive actions. However, the author all-encompassing too much negative effect at the end of the statement.
In totality, encouraging the students will lead to positive and good effects on them while ignoring the small problems and issues also be helpful to understand students. Moreover, ignoring serious problems will eventually lead to some big conflicts which are surely detrimental to their future. Perhaps the better way to phrase the statement would be ‘ the best way to teach is to praise the positive actions and ignore the negative ones that are not debilitating the class safety and student security.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 80
- Tidal power the integrated task 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Praiseworthy
...as good human contributions to mankind. praiseworthy actions ameliorate good personality and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...over, teachers should identify students who are attention seeker, and doing some action...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... praise is also negative in some ways. Moreover, ignoring the negative actions with det...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2573.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26175869121 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83004715634 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476482617587 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7883532516 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.65 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.45 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372930273407 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113688423142 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126088603045 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173089387377 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113846424388 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.