The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Ignoring negative actions and praising positives ones is not the best way to teach people. When people think about their undesirable or unwanted actions’ consequences, they are able to become more realistic individuals. Talking about negative actions should be in appropriate ways to make sure that there are no hard feelings.
It will teach one to become a better person when one understands one’s mistakes resulted by those negative actions. For instance, a couple who never talks about their negative actions, such as not being clean enough, may face problems in the future. As a result, they may end up having a large argument with one another instead of working to improve their relationship. Therefore, communication is a key in every relationship. If couples only mention their positive activities, there may be no corrections and improvements in their relationships. On the other hand, a wife can communicate kindly with her husband in case of something that she does not appreciate. For example, when her husband enters the house with his dirty shoes on, she may ask him kindly to remove them.
Additionally, talking about negative actions with careful and positive language can encourage children to learn more. Consider a child who never cleans her room and the child’s parents never mention about organizing her belongings. Consequently, this child may never be a clean and organized person. As an opposite example, a child who always cleans her room because her mother has already discussed about being clean and neat.
On the contrary, some people may believe that the best way to teach others is to ignore undesirable behavior and to mention only positive actions. It can be true in some specific situations. For instance, a mother should not blame her child if a child breaks a glass accidently. Because it can result in the child to feel unwanted or isolated. However, the mother can kindly remind her child to be more careful while she does not hurt her child’s feelings. In the meantime, the mother can praise her child about her positive actions which is beneficial to make the child more confidence.
In order to teach individuals and improve their attitudes, it is advantageous to have discussions about their negative actions in an appropriate way. Only complimenting positive action is not sufficient to help people to understand well.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-17 guozhishan 50 view
2023-12-28 mei_unavailable 83 view
2023-10-30 raghavchauhan619 66 view
2023-10-21 Jbrachael 66 view
2023-09-30 nigarsafarova 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Fariba.O :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...iscussions about their negative actions in an appropriate way. Only complimenting positive action is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, talking about, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12919896641 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83729402169 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49354005168 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0741344442 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2272727273 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163309347937 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618433614596 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804026637047 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113892117001 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494608460048 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.