Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Overwhelming benefits of using technology in schools by students can easily overtake disadvantages of distractions by such devices. In order to minimize and even eliminate the distractions, the technology itself may be employed. The Internet is one of the many tools that has come to help with learning process in academical places.
First of all, it cannot be ignored how much positive impacts of technology compared to decades ago without technology improved the speed and quality of learning. The fact that looking up a topic among millions of books rather than spending hours in a library to browsing few books is not hidden. On the other hand, the value of results returned by a search engine could be much higher than a manual search. For example, a search engine may cover thousands of international libraries whereas a manual search will be conducted in a local library with limited resources.
Although technology, specifically internet, has opened up easy access to every kind of information whether related to a matter of interest or completely different, it can be channeled such that provides more focused and related data. For instance, filtering the websites in schools will greatly eliminate distractions by social networks which can be access through the same network that learning websites are provided.
One reason, the students may get distracted is the lack of concentration on the lesson. By reducing the time that a student who has to spend learning a subject, this distraction will be diminished. Modern learning tools and innovation have greatly sped up the learning curve. As a result, the students need to spend much less time to master a topic. Therefore, they will have more self-time left for entertainment and otherwise learning.
In essence, technology has opened many new windows toward acquiring information. This information is readily available in a huge amount. Nevertheless, extracting desired data related to learning material can be conducted as fast and sound by the technology. The question is not whether we either use technology in teaching or not but it is how to utilize it in the best way to reduce distractions and improve the quality of learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 57
- The general welfare of a nation s people is a better indication of that nation s greatness than are the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In deve 58
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18539325843 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96287469125 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547752808989 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0907178863 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161639212758 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487053911505 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037814627104 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911058730569 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312883027758 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.