The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its heroines.
In this modern world actors and politician plays a major role in influencing people globally, fans follow them comprehensively starting from their behavior to their subtle details like haircut and dressing sense. It is their responsibility to lead younger generation and be meticulous before taking drastic decisions. Heroes are the idols of a community, they represent pristine form of their morals. Every society has there heroes or heroines, they want them to be an example to others and show them what how to lead their life ideally. It is not necessary that the hero exists in real life. There are numerous instances where the local people create an imaginary hero who represent the exact replica of their morals and principles.
To begin with, most of the societies have a cliché form of representing their morals and principles. It is not simple to analyse the character of a society. However, we can get a superficial understanding of their mindset. To do that the best way is to appraise their idols. Since people look up to their idols, when they face a difficult situation in their life. For instance, Gandhi is an idol of trillions he was epitome of peace and non violence. My friend Rooney had a serious problem, his neighbor's where not tidy, they used to thrown all their garbage in Rooney's lawn, he did not understand how to deal with this problem. Since, when he tried to talk to them, they where obstinate and the reason they given where, it was wind that is blowing the dust on Rooney's side. Hitherto Rooney started cleaning their lawn along with his and seeing this after few days his neighbor's where embarrassed and they apologized for their mistake. I asked Rooney was not difficult to clean both the lawns. He answered me Gandhi would have done same.
Secondly, It is not necessary that idols should exist in real life and it is not compulsory to blindly follow them, without using our consciousness that decision that they have taken is always correct. It is crucial to understand idol is just the representative of principles and the end of the day we should take morally correct decisions it only matters. For example, Salman khan is a very famous actor in India, people are crazy about him, recently he released a movie 'tere naam', Seeing his unique hair style thousands of people him. However, he has a drunk and drive case running on him. He was drunk and while he was driving he killed 5 people who where sleeping on street. People seeing this did not follow him, rather condemned him for his wrong doing and where against what he has done.
To sum up, most of the societies have idols and to have a superficial understanding of their morals it is necessary to analyze their hero's and we should not blindly follow. Since Morals and principles are which we try to seek in our idols, so it is important to be morally correct in while taking our decision. The author's have correctly addressed the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-25 | shital_patil | 58 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | Sanjida Islam | 50 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Tin tin | 61 | view |
- Claitown University needs both affordable housing for its students and a way to fund the building of such housing. The best solution to this problem is to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings. It is common knowledg 55
- "Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise." 50
- Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other 83
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per d 78
- Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 689, Rule ID: EXACT_REPLICA[1]
Message: Use simply 'replica'
Suggestion: replica
...ate an imaginary hero who represent the exact replica of their morals and principles. To b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'throw'?
Suggestion: throw
... neighbors where not tidy, they used to thrown all their garbage in Rooneys lawn, he d...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with this problem. Since, when he tried to talk to them, they where obstinate an...
^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: THEY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'were', the simple past of "to be"?
Suggestion: were
...e, when he tried to talk to them, they where obstinate and the reason they given whe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... against what he has done. To sum up, most of the societies have idols and to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 79.0 33.0505617978 239% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 511.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75929549902 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55670334868 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504892367906 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.233671089 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5384615385 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6538461538 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80769230769 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0753484274879 0.243740707755 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0275591104182 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03977024985 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499881615547 0.150359130593 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245110184497 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.