The claim and reason states that people in power should step down after five years because the revitalization through new leadership will be a path to success. We are provided with some areas as business, politics, education, government to apply a generalized approach to our analysis. But, before taking a opinion on the statement, I would discuss on the two aspects of the statement.
On gaining the position of power in leadership, a person has to understand the methodology of working in an organization. For example, when a person is introduced to government, then they have to go under rigorous training of not only the working of the policies, with colleagues but also understand the representation of the body as a whole to the other public's eye. After five year of power in a field, an entity is trained enough to implement new methods of improvisation with expertise of the experience the person had in past.
If we look at the other side of the coin, we get acquainted to the fact that the same expertise and vision might decay after span of five years and new ideas might not be as beneficial as before. The nemesis or aspiring candidate, who aims to be in the same position usually consists of the close analysis of the mistakes or improvements that can be done in governing the system at that point. Thus such a candidate if provided a chance can not only understand the system but also have the vigour to implement the change. The biggest support of this statement is the United States governing body itself, that conducts election every five years for new thought to spring up and new candidtaes to put their opinions in front. This have enabled the previous governing candidate to get the feedback of their work and other to own a perspective on what the impacted audience are owing to. Thus the reason stated in the passage of the claim is favorable for revival of new leadership and is the path of success.
As we understood the pros and cons of the statement, there is a important point to put the light on. In greater organization we usually have a multiple members administrating the body who are also called as board members. The perception here is to understand every stakeholder involved in this scenario who willl be investors, client and impacted audience. For example for the institution of education, we do have trustees, investors, staff members, children and their parents and the leadership position. If the power changes in every five years in this scenarios, the ability of the new candidate to work for all the stakeholders, taking forward the positive work of the previous body and then implementing new in favor of the same becomes a vital measure of success. In case the person defines new success paths in every five years then it would be difficult for the institutions to acclimatize every time. The impact might be on the education patterns of a child like some might favor increase in extra curricular investment time while other might oppose it. This might lead to a reverse graph then the expected increase. Hence, to step down in every five years will definitely revitalize the leadership patterns and might be of positive impact. But claiming it to be the surest path of success might lead to a greater loss.
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patro 68
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 66
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 66
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ach to our analysis. But, before taking a opinion on the statement, I would discu...
^
Line 2, column 523, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...ertise of the experience the person had in past. If we look at the other side of the c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... in governing the system at that point. Thus such a candidate if provided a chance c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 884, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...hat the impacted audience are owing to. Thus the reason stated in the passage of the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ros and cons of the statement, there is a important point to put the light on. In...
^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...organization we usually have a multiple members administrating the body who are also c...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y have a multiple members administrating the body who are also called as board me...
^^
Line 4, column 551, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...he power changes in every five years in this scenarios, the ability of the new candi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2698.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79218472469 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78132790003 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449378330373 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 868.5 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4157272446 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.636363636 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5909090909 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27613799311 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871992924691 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109421163806 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186837336465 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656735928599 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.