Usage of knowldege to implement an output then the output observed was a draft in imagination. Draft can be stated like a rough potrait of a product that will be implemented later. The statement suggests the importance of imagination higher than knowledge in professional and academic experiences. But before comparing knowledge and imagination, we will juxtapose the two and analyze their utility.
Firstly, on considering the example of technology in data processing, it can be observed that initially we used to document the codes, lists, names, projects on papers and then with advent of technology we transitioned towards use of Excel sheets. Moreover, now we can process our raw data in tabularr format via machine algoriths to format it. We had the knowledge of documenting our data, processing it in papers but the imagination to convert days tasks to hours and minutes via technology let to the implementation of the preconceived knowledge.
Similarly, with a familiar example in the field of agriculture, it can be analyzed that certain farmers who had the knowledge of soil and fertilizers could grow better yield compared to the other farmers who lacked the knowledge. It was the imagination that led to creation of tools which were efficient to determine the soil type and the crops that can easily acclamatize to native weather to convert high yielding rates. Now we also have various devices to determine the soil type, fertilizerrs, seed quality, etc. It was the knowledge of the native lands that led to better yields but the imagination of creating a higher reach and tools.
Thus I am in favor of the statement that imagination is more important that knowledge professionally and academically. Now we might be able to realize that withoout knowledge the imaginations would not have been executed or without knowledge of the issue could people imagine the solutions. The answer to these concerns is that without the imagination the knowledge to implement it will be a limited source. In the above two examples, we could have continued working on document on papers in former and obtained lower yielding crops for the farmers who lacked knowledge, thus it is vital to imagine the outputs prior to the product. Also, imagination is not limted to Agriculture or technology but it is a subset of Professions and Academic fields.
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 66
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 66
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 54
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patro 68
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... of creating a higher reach and tools. Thus I am in favor of the statement that ima...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, similarly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0987012987 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99335295547 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2845512093 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6875 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247143619307 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929926493399 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103685284568 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143448654164 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932204330643 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... of creating a higher reach and tools. Thus I am in favor of the statement that ima...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, similarly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0987012987 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99335295547 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2845512093 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6875 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247143619307 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929926493399 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103685284568 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143448654164 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932204330643 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.