There is no doubt that living on dynamic world tends to have the most updated plan, that sheds light on question that has long instigated debate and the views are typically ambivalent, that is whether ought to step down major powers such as, education, politics, business and government within five years, to ensure revitalization new leaderships for any enterprise. From my point of view, I don not agree with the statement. To substantiate my case, the following paragraphs illustrate the reasons and examples to elaborate my preference.
To begin with, the first and the foremost point coming to the mind is the abstract meaning of the enterprise which is mutual collaborations between many fields based on one concrete plan for getting the best results. In other words, to assure the success, the work have to be planned and regulated effectively. For example, planning a national park needs collaborative efforts that looking for the demographic factors, which types of games comparable with children ages and abilities. Consequently, separating the powers will lead to troubles.
Secondly, another vital point should be taken into consideration and the major problem is the time, separating these power will consume a lot of time due to mutual interconnections between them. In other words part of education plan talking about business, and politics and to have a good business with innovative thinking you have to be well educated. Hence, it is a circle lead to revitalization new leadership by applying the powers in right way. Thus, this example will ensure the point, taking a private school as enterprise project, the owner mission as a leader is to provide the best education and extracurricular activities, but the economic plan is earning money as profit.
Admittedly, the plausible leader tend to have personal traits that not affected by the
present system, for further illustrations the leader should have verbal and non verbal communication skills, flexible mind, critical thinking process and a net work of people to burgeon any project. The best example is Mahatma Gandy, he had all the leader traits that enabled him to flourish a country.
In conclusion, due to aforementioned reasons, is not plausible to step down the previous forces in order to assure the enterprise success to revitalize new leadership.
- "A folk remedy* for insomnia, the scent in lavender flowers, has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where their sleep was moni 62
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacter 58
- People should not be misled by the advertising competition between Coldex and Cold-Away, both popular over-the-counter cold medications that anyone can purchase without a doctor's prescription. Each brand is accusing the other of causing some well-known, 34
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- tpo29 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...personal traits that not affected by the present system, for further illustration...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, talking about, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.256 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97034109527 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.8225803977 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.785714286 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.21951772744 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224439843029 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658255124582 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668596498946 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102867552853 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669608583393 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.