Claim: In any situation, the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments.
Reason: Facts are objective, so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim that objective appeals triumph over subjective appeals can be misleading. Time after time we have seen the general public elude information presented to them by experts, only to be persuaded by other’s emotions. I have to disagree with this claim for the following two reasons.
To begin with, a cogent human can rationalize that facts are universal. For example, mathematics hold true here or in mars two plus two will always equal four. In the same manner when trying to influence people with facts if the information is valid it will hold true. However, this can be convoluted for some since not everyone is an expert or has an idea of how to interpret these facts. For instance, global warming is a hot topic in these currents times. Scientists have presented irrefutable data to politicians in hopes of securing funding and passing laws that wil prevent the further production of green house. The issue here is that most of the facts are too complex for people to make any real sense of it. But, the other side argues with subjective claims such as taking away innate rights and turning into a communist country. Most people can relate to this and thus get swayed ignoring all the facts. This represents how being subjective can overcome objective claims.
Futhermore, we have recently experienced an unprecedented attack on vaccines, especially, relating to COVID-19. The world’s top scientist corroborated to bring this mRNA to everyone’s house hold in hopes of eradicating the deadle virus. However, when asked questions of how the vaccine works, they presented reports and studies that most people found arcane. Words like nucleotides, ribosomes, and double sense strands are just a few. This discourages people to pay attention or be amenable for the vaccine. On the other hand, people voiced their anger and subjective ideals onto the streets linking the vaccines to autism with no empirical data or studies. However, they are able to persuade mass groups because objective claims work in the particular issue. It shows the human aspect to which most can relate in contrast to science terms that are too difficult to understand. Again, this example shows how subjective claims can be more persuasive than objective claims.
All in all, which a reasonable personal will admit that factual objective claims is the obvious choice, well this might not always be true as we can see from the previous example. It is hard to evoke someone’s opionion especially if they’re not proficient in that field. Hence, they are more inclined to listen to something they find common word with. In most cases these are subjective emotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | henry2023 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-14 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 58 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | cbol | 50 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Skittle_Mix07 | 50 | view |
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 58
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals Write a response in which you dis 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ading. Time after time we have seen the general public elude information presented to them by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, in most cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06378132118 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64294628837 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567198177677 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9354239329 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8846153846 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88461538462 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245346898365 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638467181592 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533024684614 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154824474337 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131375699983 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.