Facts, if credible, prove much more powerful in support of, or against any argument. Thus I firmly agree with the claim being made here that facts and statistics are the best way to persuade someone. In the following paragraphs, I will present some points to support my position.
Firstly, Facts, if credible, pose as single source of truth. By single source of truth, I mean there is no way you can turn down a truthy statement. For example, when we say the Earth resolves around the Sun, it is a fundamental truth that cannot be declined. Thus when appropriate facts are laid down, whether in support or against an argument, there is no way to not agree with it unless, you know that those facts are not credible.
Secondly, lets take an example of a court of justice. Primarily there are two sides, the complaining side and the defending side. When a case is fought, what happens is lawyers from both sides present facts and witnesses, which they believe to be true, before a judge as well as a jury panel and try to persuade them into believing that each of them is true. So if we see our entire justice system is based on the claim being made here.
The reason provided in support of the claim that facts are objective also helps us strengthen this claim. For example, there was a popular belief before Rutherford conducted his gold foil experiment, that the atom was supposed to have a non hollow structure where its mass was evenly distributed throughout the atom. It was only after Rutherford conducted his gold foil experiment and presented the world with authentic experimental statistics, that the world came to know that an atom is almost hollow with a significant amount of mass concentrated at the center.
In conclusion facts not only help persuade someone but also help in bringing about change, a change that is necessary for progress.
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals 50
- 45 The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a signif 73
- Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fats and cholesterol and today low fat products abound in many food stores Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old Dairy 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...in support of, or against any argument. Thus I firmly agree with the claim being mad...
^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...damental truth that cannot be declined. Thus when appropriate facts are laid down, w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to believing that each of them is true. So if we see our entire justice system is bas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, i mean, in conclusion, you know, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75617283951 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55020276471 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6865901351 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240376225388 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709949104371 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772027793947 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122099550128 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581995068508 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.