Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or

The world today is more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past but the past important decision can not underestimate today. Nowadays, complex development in the world but the past decision is very impactful.
Firstly, many historians and economists play a vital role today. So, who person decision making based on the past important decisions. Historians are writing a history based on the past story. Similarly, economists conduct research-based on analyzing past data. Also, the business perspective the stock market dependent on past stock rates. And then stockholders, based on this information, invest the money. So the stock market profit or loss depends on the company's past data. Whenever peoples perform or buy something then people refer past. So not change people's sentiments.
Secondly, past developments are also useful for researchers in different fields like chemistry, physics and also mathematics. From the perspective of medicine, the past information has led to many changes in today's life like invention of treatment procedures and many medicines. So many improvements in nowadays life easy in medical-related issues. similarly, technology improvement in the I.T. field like mobile phones new version updates on regular bases so past error rate decreases based on past public experiences. Many companies increase their performance based on past customer reviews.
Sometimes, the many unbelievable changes in the current scenario. That changes not depend on past development or information like a not huge number of coronavirus cases in the past.
In conclusion, the past important decisions are very impactful and serve as a guide to future research initiatives.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The world today is more complex than it ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the past decision is very impactful. Firstly, many historians and economists ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mists are a very aggressive role today. So, who person decision making based on the pas...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a person'.
Suggestion: who is a person
...s are a very aggressive role today. So, who person decision making based on the past impor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast. So not change peoples sentiments. Secondly, past development also useful f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...w technology occur so many improvements in nowadays life easy in medical-related issues. si...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...ys life easy in medical-related issues. similarly, technology improvement in the I.T. fie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmance based on past customer reviews. Sometimes, the many unbelievable changes...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unt of coronavirus cases in the past. In conclusion, the past important decisi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01477079978 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9880605639 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5789473684 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8947368421 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25888516371 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927663851105 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104656452734 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173017900077 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139254675294 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.49 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.