Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
The author claims that historical knowledge from past events is not helpful for today`s life standard; because, current life style is more complex and complicated than past`s. However, this assumption cannot be accepted as it stands, since it rests on number of presumptions all of which can be challenged in one way or another. I am going to go into further details in this essay to advocate my objection.
The first considerable reason that persuade me to be disaccorded with this assumption is its inadvertence to chain between the current`s activities and the past`s processes. It is lucidly explicit that all today`s program and knowledge are shaped based upon the past`s achievements. For example, in the economic states most of assumptions and guesses that render by economist are based upon the past data, like graphs about incomes and profits of last ten years is one of the apt ways to make decision for next year; although; it can be some difference among the now and the previous ten year`s methods, but there is undeniable relationship between now and past.
Another significant reason that persuades me to be against with this premise is the benefits that we can task from past. Undoubtedly, most of the current`s processes are formed based on the past`s achievement; although, the speed and pace of today`s progresses are incomparable with the past`s. However, if we want to accelerate these processes and guaranteed the success, it will be essential to have a chain with past. In this case, their failure or success enlighten our path and guide us.
On the other hand, even assuming that there is no problem with the presumption, and there are some events from past that are trivial for today`s progress; like world war second or Hitler Nazism; maybe in the first glance it seems acceptable that there are not useful for today`s decision or process; while, if they will be considered as a lesson from past which can guide us to distinguish difference between the democratic regime and autocracy. They can be indicated as effective lessons from past.
In the final analysis, the author`s claim cannot be as an utter accurate because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of assumption each of which is suspicious that makes the claim unconvincing. The recommendation can only be accepted if the blemishes already referred to are all wiped out.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Younger school student children (age five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math science, history, and language. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 70
- tpo47 86
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
- tpo41 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the assumptions') or simply say ''most assumptions''.
Suggestion: most of the assumptions; most assumptions
...ts. For example, in the economic states most of assumptions and guesses that render by economist ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213709677419 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.16935483871 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0887096774194 0.0880659088768 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0443548387097 0.0497285424764 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0443548387097 0.0444667217837 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.161290322581 0.12292977631 131% => OK
Participles: 0.0403225806452 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78094977684 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0241935483871 0.030933414821 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00403225806452 0.0016655270985 242% => OK
Determiners: 0.104838709677 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0201612903226 0.0249443105267 81% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0201612903226 0.0148568991511 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1336.0 2732.02544248 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 229.0 452.878318584 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83406113537 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.58838876751 85% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.323144104803 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.240174672489 0.280924506359 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183406113537 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.117903930131 0.132149295362 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78094977684 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 219.290929204 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620087336245 0.48968727796 127% => OK
Word variations: 64.4607570999 55.4138127331 116% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 20.6194690265 34% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 32.7142857143 23.380412469 140% => OK
Sentence length SD: 218.308338394 59.4972553346 367% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.857142857 141.124799967 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 23.380412469 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.94800884956 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 56.7317529632 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.609375 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350773929846 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109270475543 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.075408483129 0.077325440228 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.502132028385 0.547984918172 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.204412215359 0.149214159877 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153640972984 0.161403998019 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829187778846 0.0892212321368 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.365818433321 0.385218514788 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0692045440612 0% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274510924684 0.275328986314 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757399903139 0.0653680567796 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.4325221239 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 7.22455752212 14% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 3.0 13.5995575221 22% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.