There are so many problems in our daily lives. We have to acknowledge that laws and legal system can help address various problems, such as murder, robbery or evasion of taxes. We have laws helping us determine the punishment given to a criminal according to what he has done. However, there are also lots of problems which are not easily solved with laws and the legal system, many of which do not have some widely accepted answers.
Not all the things are either correct or wrong. There are many problems related to family or love, which complicate all those involved, and it is difficult to use simple clauses to fully address the problem. For example, for a newly married couple who have just finished a day of heavy work and get back home, when it comes to who should be in charge of washing clothes and cleaning the house, there is no correct answer. And it is also impossible to use laws or the legal system to find an answer. They are both extremely tired, but in order to maintain a warm home and a stable love, they have to force themselves to do the housework. This is something related to moral, not laws. There are many other similar problems, such as whether one should lend his/her best friend money, whether to give some extra bread to hungry and homeless tramps and so on.
Even if the problem itself has a widely accepted solution or answer, we still cannot expect to use the laws to solve all such problems. The law is quite limited. The length is limited and finite. However, there are infinite problems in our daily lives. If we were able to solve any problems with the legal system, we would not need to do so many revision and modification to the laws.
However, laws can change what is in people's minds. We are all familiar with the laws against sex and racial discrimination, and these laws indeed help people to be more impartial when it comes to these problems. Without the laws against slavery, this cruel system may be still active nowadays and people may still regard it as rational and correct.
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 45
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 58
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun revision seems to be countable; consider using: 'many revisions'.
Suggestion: many revisions
...egal system, we would not need to do so many revision and modification to the laws. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57534246575 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28670474211 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7851001844 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8947368421 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248579746109 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775275739266 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660336925958 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16334988954 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511658243467 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.