Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate — and, perhaps, even cruel — to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author issue to nation should suspend government funding for the arts when significant number of their citizen are hungry or unemployed is a contentious one. Both the sides of suspending the fund or not have strengths and weakness. However, I choose the side of the government continuing the funds ofr the art as the skill development is also an important part for the country growth and may be in future they can be job givers. Furthermore, having funds for art and promoting art also help the nation to get the global representation. Nonetheless, the funds must be such that the government also meets the need to the needy people to provide them with the basic necessity of food and job.
The government need to allocate some percentage of the budget for funding and improving the culture of art and develop the skill among their constituent. The art could be many form like music theaters, dancing , painting and many more. Giving the support such groups will help them and motivate them to do better. For example giving support to them will represent them at world stag like academy awards or grammy awards which will help the nation to get global recognition.
Moreover, the funds also help to generate more employment. For example, government supporting a thatcher artist which means they are encourage to do more plays or make new movies. And production all the art work require a large amount of backend support to make set, to fix lights and many logistic areas. Hence, these is also a way to provide job to a large section of people and sustain their work. This way the groups can become self sustaining and be job providers.
However, the percentage should not burden the government and heavy sum of the money need to spend for the improvement of the needy people. Government must focus to provide the basic necessity of food and shelter to its citizen. In case of cruises the priority is always given to help the needy people. The government must decide upon the priority and threshold for the amount spend on both the part for art and providing food.
In conclusion, the government need to decide and fix the priority of the country as per circumstances. But, the funds for art will definitely help to improve the condition for some people and its also a major source to create jobs and provide money to the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e many form like music theaters, dancing , painting and many more. Giving the supp...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
... a thatcher artist which means they are encourage to do more plays or make new movies. An...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...r artist which means they are encourage to do more plays or make new movies. And prod...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7881773399 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56685858333 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460591133005 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.251111095 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328269303755 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106233567905 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114722227798 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184250359989 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117016681773 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.