Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate - and, perhaps, even cruel - to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The topic raises the controversial issue of whether the government should cancel funding for the arts when hunger and unemployment are ubiquitous in the country. Indisputably, arts are important for a nation as it represents the culture of the nation, ensure new employment and encourage people to concentrate on arts. Nevertheless, hungry nations are more cognizant of food rather than arts, and starvation and lack of jobs may engender chaos in all over the country. Thus, I mostly agree with the claim that the authority should rescind funding for arts, despite the fact that arts have significant contributions, while most people lack of food and employment.
First of all, people who are starving and lacking jobs do not really care about arts because what they concern more about is food and standard of living. To illustrate, take Africa as an example; most Africans are impoverished and do not get the minimum food needed to live. Even if they find food for lunch, they are not sure about dinner. In this case, will they actually be aware of the arts? arts will not manage food for them. So, the government should provide minimum food for them instead of spending money on arts because food is mandatory for them.
Furthermore, hunger and unemployment may cause an uprising in the country. For instance, Arab Spring (which started in 2010 in Egypt) is the result of several reasons: poverty, lack of food, and meager jobs -- leading the whole Arab-majority states to catastrophe. So, if the government does pay attention to arts rather its citizens will lead rebellion. If people get enough food and unemployment is low, they will be encouraged to arts and thus the culture of the country will be flourished.
However, arts are also imperative for a nation to be developed. Because arts represent the culture of the nation, lives of the people, and overall developments of the country. Apart from these, arts can create employment as well. When the government will provide more funding for the arts, people will be encouraged and motivated to arts, which will finally enhance the arts.
In conclusion, if the citizens are hungry or unemployed, although the arts are important for a nation, the government then should focus on its citizens rather than the arts. Because improving people's living standards will finally enhance the arts and thus culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Arts
...ill they actually be aware of the arts? arts will not manage food for them. So, the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le Arab-majority states to catastrophe. So, if the government does pay attention to ar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, then, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04336734694 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68913528272 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477040816327 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2716617013 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.85 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298500424015 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101962193071 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647227262962 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191088990566 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661988667609 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.