Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful

Currently, digital devices are everywhere. Everyone has smartphones. Today the world is leading towards the digital scenario where portable devices are increasing their impact day by day. They are leading the world through the process of digitalization. This is good for us in many aspects. But as every coin has two different sides so do these devices. Doing everything on our phone has taken us far away from each other in the real world.

Here, one of the main reasons to approach this mentality is smartphones and tablets and many more. There are numerous ways in which these devices prevent us from socializing. One fine example for it is, kids in today’s generation play more games rather than going outside and playing with their friends. The same consequences are observed in the adults as well.

Here the main reason displayed which encourages these kind of behaviour is that social media or smart devices attracts the user to get in touch with people or artificial intelligence bots which gives them fake confidence and escape from engaging with the people around them.

As of my observations, I think that a prime reason for limitations in the communication of two individuals is executed due to the extensive use of smartphone. Honestly, now-a-days people use their smartphones to avoid conversations at social gatherings and even in professional scenarios since after lock-down work-from-home has been implemented as a possible option. This has resulted in a further down-sizing of human interactions in real life providing them an opportunity to escape from the harsh realities their world might have to offer.

As of my understanding, this can be stated as a medium that people are extensively using to escape from reality and avoid honest opinions and conversations. These can be an effect of using social media extensively day over day and getting high dopamine rush while talking with strangers.

One mentality that social media develops is that it allows you to know or see the information of a person as much as they want you to see. So here it becomes easier for everyone to hide their flaws and present them as something special and interesting. Influenced by this side of a person, others generally reach out to them, and continued discussions begin with lack of complete information. This sounds good in their perspective. But in social terms it is harmful for an individual that is relating with a person who has only one side to show you and you are completely unaware of facts that they are hiding.

The extensive use of social media develops this mentality for you and then you start avoiding the public gatherings fearing that they will get to know a particular side of you. Hence throwing you under the bus. You will be scared of falling in such a problem and getting exposed to them. This fear may also result in social anxiety in an individual.

These were some of the long-term impacts that social media causes in one individual. Along with these impacts, currently, tech is evolving towards more efficient AI powered tools. These tools reduce human interactions and lead into lesser amount of interactions. One such example of the same is AI powered chatbot which can efficiently answer to many users at once without any investments.

All the technologies are currently being practiced by today’s generation. However, at one point of time we need to understand that there resides a world outside the smartphone and internet which is more powerful and important than the fake world and fake scenarios we have all created. There are several solutions for it. But, at the end an individual needs to understand and prioritize their relations and human beings. Such problems require efficient practices involving no-screen time or no usage of devices of any kind.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... main reason displayed which encourages these kind of behaviour is that social media or sm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...onfidence and escape from engaging with the people around them. As of my observations, I think tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lities their world might have to offer. As of my understanding, this can be stat...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...l get to know a particular side of you. Hence throwing you under the bus. You will b...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 12, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nxiety in an individual. These were some of the long-term impacts that social media cau...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, honestly, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, i think, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3190.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 632.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04746835443 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01394158123 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8253446523 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 321.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507911392405 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1008.0 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.8182232413 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1428571429 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0571428571 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201915740223 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433663048957 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389822156267 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909120891305 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354424178293 0.0667264976115 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... main reason displayed which encourages these kind of behaviour is that social media or sm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...onfidence and escape from engaging with the people around them. As of my observations, I think tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lities their world might have to offer. As of my understanding, this can be stat...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...l get to know a particular side of you. Hence throwing you under the bus. You will b...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 12, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nxiety in an individual. These were some of the long-term impacts that social media cau...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, honestly, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, i think, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3190.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 632.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04746835443 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01394158123 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8253446523 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 321.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507911392405 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 1008.0 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.8182232413 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1428571429 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0571428571 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201915740223 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433663048957 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389822156267 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909120891305 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354424178293 0.0667264976115 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.