Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The write of the issue states that university faculties need to spend time on working outside the university in the field that related to those course they teach. From my perspective, it can be a great deal for faculties due to the reasons I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, faculties can use their knowledge to help the world outside the university. They already have been professional in the field they teach in the university as a professor. As a result, they can use their knowledge changing the society to a better place. For instance, imagine a professor in a engineering field like industrial engineer, and he already is in the top ranked professor in a country. He can use his knowledge to change the industry by giving some fresh ideas that can help to improve production. By doing so, the company he works on make a lot of profit, and can use it in other fields. Consequently, the knowledge of the professor can change the economy of the country.
Moreover, the professor always read articles and papers in academic world and he does not know about industry. A break from academic world into the reality can help him to understand everything he read before in real life. As a result, when he want to teach courses which are skillful on them, he can use his experiences in a real life to expound the terms for the student. For example, an engineer professor always read how to steam machine works, but he did not see one of those in real life. Hence, after a while in industry, he can learn new thing about steam machine when he work with it. Therefor, he can explain better the term of those machine for students.
Taking all factors above into consideration, the university should require all faculties to spend time in real life outside the academic world in order to have more productive professors. By doing so, not only professors can use their knowledge to improve industry, but also they can improve their knowledge in the field they work on, so they can have more effective course in universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The write of the issue states that university fac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e. For instance, imagine a professor in a engineering field like industrial engin...
^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...fore in real life. As a result, when he want to teach courses which are skillful on ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71030640669 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65705457481 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467966573816 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7069192915 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235570185225 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878722401713 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117643488781 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190605585615 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111241300747 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.