Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The author of this statement recommends that all faculties must spend time working outside of academic environment. As far as I am concerned, this is a controversial issue and we can not give the same answer for all courses. I take this position account the following reasons.
First, most professors usually have high theoretical knowledge, which they gained in the university. Nevertheless, working out of academic environment allows them to enrich their knowledge. I think that a small instance can give some light on this topic. When a biology teacher works out of the university, he can gain first information about humans’ effects on the nature. In addition, he can use of all sense to comprehend of what they teach in the university, and even better answer for how to control nature disasters. So, the biggest advantages of the working out for teachers lie in the fact that enriches their knowledge.
In contrast, this policy may be usefulness in some courses such as mathematics. The university has many special facilities that a teacher can not have access them out of university. I think that there is not a better example of teacher of theoretical physics. This teacher has to use of mathematics equation and computer applications for confirming his theory. In addition, the specialized laboratory allows him to do accurately experiments and gain better result.
All above evidence supports this fact that working out of academic environment can assists teachers to enrich their knowledge, gain deeper understanding, and improve their method of teaching. Admittedly, as an English proverb “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those have the opposite view partially reasonable that in some field of study, teachers needs to work in the in the specialized laboratories, which only are in the university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | tedyang777 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Danbrilliant | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Danbrilliant | 62 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Afia Ibnath | 62 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Afia Ibnath | 16 | view |
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 58
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 58
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely experiments and gain better result. All above evidence supports this fact th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'assist'
Suggestion: assist
...working out of academic environment can assists teachers to enrich their knowledge, gai...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in the'.
Suggestion: in the
... field of study, teachers needs to work in the in the specialized laboratories, which only ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'as to', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238805970149 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.134328358209 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0805970149254 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0388059701493 0.0497285424764 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0507462686567 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14328358209 0.12292977631 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0179104477612 0.0406280797675 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.05723569891 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0208955223881 0.030933414821 68% => OK
Particles: 0.00298507462687 0.0016655270985 179% => OK
Determiners: 0.113432835821 0.0997080785238 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0238805970149 0.0249443105267 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149253731343 0.0148568991511 100% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1837.0 2732.02544248 67% => OK
No of words: 293.0 452.878318584 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26962457338 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.58838876751 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382252559727 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317406143345 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22866894198 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170648464164 0.132149295362 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05723569891 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549488054608 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 56.6772113008 55.4138127331 102% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3125 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0092067243 59.4972553346 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8125 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.0531143345 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.78666666667 1.64882698954 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312201372149 0.391690518653 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0841671929213 0.123202303941 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0576661503761 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486703050235 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128153686825 0.149214159877 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120010449114 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729784091628 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.344735221656 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0498005203015 0.0692045440612 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221629945645 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446236178522 0.0653680567796 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.