Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author claims that, company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence which will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuit. Even though many employee spend lots of time in email correspondence, but I cannot agree with the statement.
First of all, to solve or reduce a problem, one have to find out what is the main cause. And then have to take necessary step. But before taking step, one also should consider the side effect of that step.
By this statement, it is clear that, the author assume that, employ waste a lots of time in email correspondence. And because of that a company is facing some problem. And so, management should conclude routine monitoring. But there are lots of thing by which time may waste. Such as playing games in mobile, gossiping in rest room etc. So, there is no benefit in monitoring the email correspondence only.
Second, monitoring is such way may have some negative effect. If employ can understand that , the management are monitoring them, It will affect their mind. The result may be goes in opposite site. For example, consider , parents of a student always monitor in his computer gaming, and give restriction , so that the student spend more time on study . By this , study time may be increased , but it will be not sure that the effectiveness will increase.
Moreover, if any employ get satisfaction , enjoy his works, it will reduce the waste. Because, By this, employee will do their job for their self satisfaction.
At last, I want to conclude that monitoring in email correspondence will not be effective is reducing waste of resources. It will be more effective to try in other ways by which, employee will get self satisfaction in his work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.Write a response in which you di 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct the company from lawsuit. Even though many employee spend lots of time in ema...
^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun employee seems to be countable; consider using: 'many employees'.
Suggestion: many employees
... the company from lawsuit. Even though many employee spend lots of time in email correspond...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugh many employee spend lots of time in email correspondence, but I cannot agree...
^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...t, the author assume that, employ waste a lots of time in email correspondence. And be...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...clude routine monitoring. But there are lots of thing by which time may waste. Such as playin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est room etc. So, there is no benefit in monitoring the email correspondence only...
^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ve effect. If employ can understand that , the management are monitoring them, It ...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in opposite site. For example, consider , parents of a student always monitor in ...
^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is computer gaming, and give restriction , so that the student spend more time on ...
^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hat the student spend more time on study . By this , study time may be increased ,...
^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...udent spend more time on study . By this , study time may be increased , but it wi...
^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... . By this , study time may be increased , but it will be not sure that the effect...
^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...Moreover, if any employ get satisfaction , enjoy his works, it will reduce the was...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'for example', 'such as', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238764044944 0.238963963785 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.14606741573 0.154291517835 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0674157303371 0.0886310499679 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0421348314607 0.0506014161523 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0393258426966 0.0449626384858 87% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13202247191 0.123526278965 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0224719101124 0.0379742944744 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77181323294 2.82910677849 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0140449438202 0.0316879551592 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00280898876404 0.0014075125626 200% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0786516853933 0.0950106342287 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0505617977528 0.0245489744465 206% => Try to use less modal verbs (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0112359550562 0.0157978311181 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1816.0 2899.98275862 63% => OK
No of words: 314.0 478.390804598 66% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78343949045 6.0591788892 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.65681771538 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.302547770701 0.369966551584 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.213375796178 0.285172536893 75% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156050955414 0.207245337619 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101910828025 0.136322040163 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77181323294 2.82910677849 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 234.298850575 70% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519108280255 0.492565540709 105% => OK
Word variations: 53.2399322317 56.8184620615 94% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 21.1264367816 95% => OK
Sentence length: 15.7 23.7468607788 66% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.15934216 62.0618507366 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 143.81877709 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 23.7468607788 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.728815259664 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.87931034483 123% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.71264367816 169% => OK
Readability: 37.0375796178 52.2641144681 71% => OK
Elegance: 1.72839506173 1.64547068916 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473074868098 0.39480681544 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0968568360185 0.11556216369 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.066759711978 0.0736162880345 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524673984494 0.531340600358 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158295886061 0.15197228837 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1473332507 0.158818324754 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156392991337 0.0851127212816 184% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.213142068838 0.388921930462 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0639790002743 0.0677916285025 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26669514098 0.28015025965 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.212195447273 0.0610219844235 348% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.8591954023 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30459770115 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.96264367816 121% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.10632183908 49% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.93390804598 178% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.04597701149 131% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 15.0862068966 99% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.0 Out of 6