Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Recently there have been major debates around true means to measure intelligence. Creativity is often cited as one of the ways
to measure intelligence. Since creativity is often an original and authentic representation of individual thoughts and inner emotions people often consider creativity as a true depiction of one's thinking capabilities and imagining scope. Creativity does represent the true capacity of one's thinking capabilities but that can not be the only true method to measure intelligence. Being a creative person does not mean that he is intelligent and vice versa.
Creativity is one of the forms in which a person expresses his inner thoughts and his imagining skills. Looking at a painting of an artist or reading a novel can help us understand how deeply and thoughtfully the true emotions of an artist are expressed through different visuals and characters. Creativity can help us to analyse an individual presentation skills but defining intelligence solely on creativity does not seem justifiable. It is very true that a person who may not be good at presentation skills might be very intelligent and have exceptional scientific or non-scientific knowledge. Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam the indian rocket scientist is a great example of this. From failing in school exams to getting rejected in multiple interviews does not mean that he was stupid. He did not have any exceptional skills in any form of creative field. Getting familiar with the rocketry field in adulthood and love for seeing the rockets touching the sky resulted in Dr. Kalam achieving the unachievable. So does creativity truly define intelligence? Not in the case of Dr. Kalam and in many more such cases. Creativity can help us to understand a person's thoughts but is not a form to measure the intelligence of a person who might be good in presentation skills or creative enough to present things which look surprising does not mean that he is intelligent. A simple maths problem may be hard for an artist and a mathematician might not be very good at creative arts.
People may argue that creativity is a true inner expression and should be used to measure true intelligence as it expresses the authentic beliefs and thoughts of a person. But this belief has a flaw as it believes that a person is exceptional in presenting his thoughts. As in the previous paragraph, it is obvious that a person with exceptional thinking skills might not always be able to express his thoughts clearly. Hence, this belief does not seem to work.
The definition of intelligence is very vague and hence measuring intelligence becomes difficult. Can an exceptional artist be called intelligent or a professional computer engineer? A person might be exceptional in art and might fail elementary grade mathematics and vice versa will be true for a computer engineer. Expertise can be developed in a field by practising it regularly. One can develop exceptional painting skills or computer programming skills but will it be sufficient to judge an individual intelligence seems doubtful. Depending only and only upon creativity to measure true intelligence does not justify and new parameters must be incorporated to best accommodate each person's uniqueness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-10 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-05-19 | ascetichedonist | 66 | view |
- Schools should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
- Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 66
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when school buildings are in need of repair Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...t mean that he is intelligent. A simple maths problem may be hard for an artist and a...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 493, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'individual intelligence'.
Suggestion: individual intelligence
...ills but will it be sufficient to judge an individual intelligence seems doubtful. Depending only and only...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 687, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e incorporated to best accommodate each persons uniqueness.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1619047619 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12712599791 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426666666667 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 855.9 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1547502134 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.37037037 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2962962963 5.21951772744 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17751744535 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590284392711 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422654545876 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113462483113 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300951543012 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...t mean that he is intelligent. A simple maths problem may be hard for an artist and a...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 493, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'individual intelligence'.
Suggestion: individual intelligence
...ills but will it be sufficient to judge an individual intelligence seems doubtful. Depending only and only...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 687, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e incorporated to best accommodate each persons uniqueness.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1619047619 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12712599791 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426666666667 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 855.9 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1547502134 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.37037037 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2962962963 5.21951772744 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17751744535 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590284392711 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422654545876 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113462483113 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300951543012 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.