Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author claim that critical judgement of work in any given field has more value when it comes from someone who is expert in that field. I do not agree with this claim because someone might be expert in a field, but layperson is the one who benefits or suffers from the work in any given field. So, critical judgement of work in any given field is very important when it comes from a layperson.
First, medical service is a very important field. Doctor is the one who is expert in medical service. And patient is the one who benefits or suffers from the work of doctors. When a patient does not get necessary treatment due to lack of attention from a doctor, it has serious consequences. In this case, it does not have to be an expert to critically judge the work of the doctor. If the management takes the opinion of patient seriously, it will make the service better.
Second, the educational institutes play a significant role in our society. They shape society as well as the world through teaching, learning, research and knowledge creation. A student is supposed to be better person after completion of his/her educational degree. Though the teachers and other facilitators are responsible for the educational activities, the education becomes more effective when the involve parents in the process. An educational institute becomes better when they evaluate the critical judgement of the parents regularly.
Some may argue that the critical judgement should only come from experts because they are the only one who understand the work. This argument is not necessarily true because one may have all the expertise in his hand, but it is the layperson who is experiencing the work of the expert. So, the critical judgement of a layperson in any given field should be consider as valuable as the critical judgement of the expert.
Since layperson is the one who benefits/suffers from the work of expert and experience the real life consequences, it is not true that critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- gh 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 26
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the exposure problems of the future. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain you 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e education becomes more effective when the involve parents in the process. An educational ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...t of the parents regularly. Some may argue that the critical judgement should only...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'considered'?
Suggestion: considered
... layperson in any given field should be consider as valuable as the critical judgement o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85833333333 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72629938439 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422222222222 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2565482028 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72222222222 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344961884111 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120200436763 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130655718051 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2301521572 0.150359130593 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155995499876 0.0667264976115 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.