Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Giving valuable judgment is always encouraged in our society. It will always have a positive effect on others. I am positive that people can give valuable judgment to other fields even if they are not experts in those fields.
Judgments from non-experts and other fields can give different aspects and ideas to the experts in a particular field we are criticizing. People tend to think that we should not criticize other fields we are not experts in, since we will be considered reckless and ignorant. However, experts who provide services and entertainment need feedback from the public who are not experts. For example, chefs who have decades of experiment in cooking and pastry regard the judgments of their customers as highly valuable. Sometimes they even encourage diners to give harsh and strict feedback because they think non-experts might have a different view of the dish that chefs have overlooked. Thus, their skills can move to a higher level and become a better chef.
Moreover, we also give judgments on music and art, and artists tend to like their work being judged because others' opinions might be the next music idea or art topic. We do not have to excel in music editing or painting to be able to feel the meaning of the piece of art. Individuals have different feelings towards an art piece, and when artists collect public feedback, they might produce something more marvelous. Nowadays, where artists upload their work online, feedback from the public will appear in the comment section. Artists can get responses to people's judgments and even have discussions with them. They are thus making their work more popular and successful.
However, some may argue that fields that require a large amount of background knowledge like physics, mathematics, and engineering cannot be easily judged. Without proper training and experience, judgment toward there fields are useless unless you are an expert. However, there are only a few experts in a particular field. Judgments from their peers may sometimes be narrow. For example, when professors faced a problematic issue in the laboratory, the same fields of experts might have the same way of solving problems and thinking. It is hard for them to have out of the box thinking. By accepting judgments from their students or other professors at other departments, their problems might be solved faster.
While judgments from the same field of experts might have a narrow aspect, judgments from other fields or non-experts might have more valuable feedback.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequ 63
- During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on-the-job acci 63
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14492753623 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58239560597 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495169082126 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7041516688 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6086956522 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26086956522 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189995661232 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653265600775 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618190788083 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122913386687 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431869530592 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.