Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
If the aim is to benefit the country, what facility should government spend on? Although some believe improving internet access stands as priority choice, it is improving public transportation contribute the greatest benefit for citizens.
It is so argued that government should enhance internet in rural area, because internet can let people know the information or learn knowledge around the world, and this is the way for them to get out of poor. Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, those people in rural area may not have money to buy electronic devices. Internet will be totally useless for them. For example, in the countryside of India, most of the people are still using traditional phone which cannot connect to internet. By contrast, if government build railway in those area, people can easily go to city with only few cost. Beside, they can find some high pay jobs or educated in city. This is the only way for them to become wealthy.
Supporters of spending money on internet may still argue that improving internet is much cheaper. The real picture, however, is that the investment of building railway is worth it. If government give an easy way for people to go to those rural place. It may be lots of traveler who want to experience rural life or enjoy the beautiful scenery they cannot see in city. This will not only bring lots of jobs for hotel or tourist guide but also allow local government to collect more tax than the money they pay for public transportation.
Lastly, most of the large city today has faced lots of questions. Building public transportation in city can reduce Co2 emission, reducing traffic jam, allowing parking lot left. Moreover, Once people can go to work without driving themselves, due to the convenient metro. People can reduce enormous payment for buying or repairing a car. Those advantages will not happen by improving internet.
So beneficial is building public transportation that it must be taken into more serious consideration. It is this choice allow people going to city, developing rural area, and solving the problem in city.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than the news presented by whose views are different from your own 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...ontrast, if government build railway in those area, people can easily go to city with only...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cost seems to be countable; consider using: 'few costs'.
Suggestion: few costs
... people can easily go to city with only few cost. Beside, they can find some high pay jo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not happen by improving internet. So beneficial is building public transpo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, still, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68290302788 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543661971831 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.624550143 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5238095238 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222250482919 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681689636946 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692349834629 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135833501084 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688229315902 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.