Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions have the authority to decide or adjudge the application of student, institution decides whether one student is eligible for a particular stream or not, there are certain criteria and one student satisfying all criteria is eligible for a specific subject. Educational institutions do not access the potential of a student so should not dissuade any student from pursuing any stream of his/her choice.
There are many examples in the history of education where students are judged by their academic history and not bu their potential to study a subject. As we all know "Jack Ma" sho is the founder of Alibaba, applied 10 times to "Havard University" but got rejected by institution every time, later on in his life that he understands the business, university committee might not be accessed the potential of an entrepreneur and failed to give him an opportunity.
Best inventors in the history of science, best artists, best musicians in the history of art and literature were deprived by the institution and they have reached the pinnacle of their fields, so education institutes should not interfere in the decision of a student regarding the fields of study the student wants to pursue.
There are some certain standards where the eligibility of student that can be measured but that should not be the only parameters, educational institutions should be more open for students who want to pursue the subject of their choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 33
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the execu 23
- There should be one curriculum in a nation 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
... failed to give him an opportunity. Best inventors in the history of science, be...
^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...Best inventors in the history of science, best artists, best musicians in the history ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
... in the history of science, best artists, best musicians in the history of art and lit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 237.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24894514768 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02986493752 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540084388186 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1784913094 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 207.333333333 118.986275619 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 23.4991977007 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150769592525 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841971786505 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433678730197 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954418314118 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424345429134 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 48.8420337079 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 12.1743820225 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 23.0 11.7820224719 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.