Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo

Essay topics:

Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The argument mentions that academies should encourage students to have majors which can make them rich. It is definitely a good idea for every student to think about their future income; however, passion is the most important thing in everybody's job.
First of all, interest is the most important thing to pay attention to and not the money when every student decides about their major. Thus, students need to think and see what kind of job they want in the future. Imagine a student who encouraged by counselors and family members to choose medical field, but he/she actually loves to be a social worker. If that student decides to be a doctor, he/she might end of being bored to study and even drop out of school because passion is really important to continue our path especially when things get overwhelmed.
In addition, being successful might be a different definition for everyone. Consider someone who wants to enjoy her/his job whereas someone who just want to make a lot of money. Obviously, there is a big difference between these two situations. People can be satisfied in their jobs when they are interested in their job responsibilities. But if people do not like their job, they might get frustrated at work easily or even might not have good attitudes with their co-workers. So, they might even quit their job when something even small goes wrong.
However, some people might believe that money is everything in job. It can be true sometimes, but if people have passion about their career, they can earn more money eventually. For example, a waiters can work from bottom line and get more experience with promotion to become a restaurant manager someday. It might take longer than someone who already has a managing degree, but later or sooner that waiter will get what he wants.
It might be true that having lucrative careers should be a goal for every student, but money is not everything. Encouraging students to choose majors which can make a lot of money for them is good, but at the end of day, happiness is much more important than money.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-21 TiOluwani97 83 view
2023-07-05 PranaviN 50 view
2023-05-25 shashank__hegde 33 view
2022-12-16 Christiana Longe 50 view
2022-08-28 yyh123 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Fariba.O :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a waiter' or simply 'waiters'?
Suggestion: a waiter; waiters
...arn more money eventually. For example, a waiters can work from bottom line and get more ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, really, so, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, kind of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81179775281 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5275701713 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519662921348 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3932493389 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149570948836 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535072348684 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047916332034 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106167116068 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547706964903 0.0667264976115 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.