Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement that "Teacher or the one who makes students learn about the facts and other articles should first make them learn the ideas, trends, and concepts regarding the fact and then make them understand the fact regarding it" is an interesting topic. This issue is increasingly important in this modern life which revolves around the education, its application and specially the methods used for teaching. The statement here has two main centers: the one on the facts attached to the ideas trends and concept as second. I would argue in favor of this statement that ideas, concepts, and trends should be taught first and then should come the facts regarding it.
As discussed above, I would argue that the fact should come after the ideas, trends concepts, the example supporting my stand is as follows: Consider a kindergarten student who still don't know the concept of numbers then how would he/she be able to learn the facts regarding the table, prime, co prime numbers etc. In this case the student should know the concept and have the idea regarding the numbers and then only he would be able to start with the facts regarding it. After the concepts regarding it are clear he/she would be able to grasp the facts and the conclusion regarding it.
Facts are result of the incidence that the scholarly people have noticed so far. Same way if the student are made to learn the concepts and trends then they would be able to interpret the facts in their own way, and as students are more curious ablout all this can also lead to exploration of new field and ideas regarding the subject.
Continuing on the above established foundation, an example supporting my stand is as follows, Einstein in his late teenage duration was a paper checker at an institution which checks the research paper of the scientist. He was assigned the work to check that "no two research paper should be same or copied". He would read each and every paper with the curiosity, and with this he got to know the misunderstanding about different student and about their theories, and learned the concepts regarding the physics and later become one of the scientist regarding the quantum physics. So this leads to the conclusion that he got his knowledge from the concepts and mistakes made my other students and then developed the facts regarding it.
Concluding my topic. I have argued in favor of the statement that "The concepts are the one that should be learned first and then comes the facts". It would help the to not only grasp the facts more accurately but can also lead to exploration of new ideas and facts. I have presented the example of a kindergarten student and the scientist Albert Einstein to bolster my stand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | afsal2323 | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper."In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government c 62
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the po 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 50
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reas 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nsider a kindergarten student who still dont know the concept of numbers then how wo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...oncept of numbers then how would he/she be able to learn the facts regarding the t...
^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ing it. After the concepts regarding it are clear he/she would be able to grasp the...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'to start with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224568138196 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.182341650672 0.157235817809 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0479846449136 0.0880659088768 54% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0518234165067 0.0497285424764 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0556621880998 0.0444667217837 125% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.084452975048 0.12292977631 69% => OK
Participles: 0.0595009596929 0.0406280797675 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57607242436 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0249520153551 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134357005758 0.0997080785238 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0326295585413 0.0249443105267 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0115163147793 0.0148568991511 78% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2745.0 2732.02544248 100% => OK
No of words: 469.0 452.878318584 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85287846482 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.307036247335 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.236673773987 0.280924506359 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181236673774 0.200843997647 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123667377399 0.132149295362 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57607242436 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409381663113 0.48968727796 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.363460546 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 27.5882352941 23.380412469 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2813949209 59.4972553346 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.470588235 141.124799967 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5882352941 23.380412469 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.588235294118 0.674092028746 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 51.2556126928 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.27152317881 1.64882698954 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443019587997 0.391690518653 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.169952218614 0.123202303941 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.122458182423 0.077325440228 158% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.652745934478 0.547984918172 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185190085468 0.149214159877 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230980555072 0.161403998019 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084213686123 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.555326097291 0.385218514788 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.05413442832 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350994372315 0.275328986314 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255121662096 0.0653680567796 39% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.