The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The quality of life that is offered to the citizens of a country demonstrates how effective is the country’s leadership. A well sound government leaders, who take responsibility of improving their country’s living standards, take appropriate requires steps or measures to ensure that their goal is achieved. One can argue that in most of the democratic countries, the leadership is often changed over the course of time, and still the people of that country have a good living standard. However, it is often observed that in those countries, people elect the same leaders again who aim to improve their (citizens) quality of life.
“Leadership” is often considered as a whole, but it can be measured by diving it into multiple components and judge it accordingly. For instance, the overall administration of the government constitutes of various ministry like health, food, education etc. For a country like India, it is possible to produce high number of research aspirants, or engineers or other skilled people is because of its education system, which implies that the leaders of such department are doing a good job. It is very unlikely that even after having a poor administration or leadership, people enjoy their high living standards. On the other hand, the cost of basic amenities in India has meteorically risen. For example, People in India are upset of the rise of petrol prices even though the cost of crude oil in comparatively very low in the international market. Thus, the ineffectiveness of the leaders have directly impacted the life of the commons.
It can be easily noticed that the kind of the leader that a nation has, is a direct view of how it affects the life of the people. Dictatorship, being a form of “leadership, has led many countries to their economic downfall and debased the quality of life of those citizens. To exemplify, North Korea has dictatorship form of government. People are not allowed even to travel outside country without the leader’s approval. Most of the population is still struggling for basic needs of survival. The condition could have been completely opposite if the leaders were focused towards enhancing the living standards of their citizen. Furthermore, Syria, a country which his adversely hit by violence and destruction, has still not been able to bring acceptable standards of living. Thus, it becomes and unavoidable fact that the quality of life that the citizen are facing, emphasises more on the effectiveness of the leaders, rather than the type of leadership that a country has.
Even though the history enlightens that there were several countries who got their independence in same time period, a wide difference can be seen between the developed and developing countries. A poor leadership can destroy the hard earned development and pull it back to several decades as far as its growth is concerned. Although, the leaders of a country keep on changing with time, the change is the quality of wellness of the citizens is a clear indication of how good or bad a leaders are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by diving it into multiple components and judge it accordingly. For instance, ...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...verall administration of the government constitutes of various ministry like health, food, edu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...e people. Dictatorship, being a form of “leadership, has led many countries to th...
^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries. A poor leadership can destroy the hard earned development and pull it ...
^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...s a clear indication of how good or bad a leaders are.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07524752475 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97778988921 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50099009901 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2122619956 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9545454545 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204467150534 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597637182672 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488383605449 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129890861312 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275801304493 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.