Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The technological world saw an immense shift with the innovation of computers, internet and video which helped people to share the content (knowledge, news, or even jokes) with such a speed that was never possible before. Specially, in terms of education they have been a boon as they help in educating students efficiently, as compared to earlier model of cramming. However, their uncontrolled use can take the direction of distracting more than educating the children. I strongly believe that innovations such as video, computer, and Internet have boosted the understanding of every student but, the extent to which they are used determine that whether they be distractive to the students
There are several new teaching mechanisms developed with complete focus on enhancing student’s understanding level. For example, Smart classes, that makes the use of video software, through a computer connected via internet has become the primacy of education system in various countries. It tends to develop better understanding of concepts using interactive diagrams, charts and illustrative figures, as compared to static texts from the books. The level of understanding gained by a student tends is seen be long lasting as compared to restricted bookish knowledge that students often try to cram and pass examinations.
These innovations have also opened various sources from where any student can learn. Now, they can have various point of information, such as different books, video lessons or even different instructors who can share their knowledge globally. This benefit was missing before. It was very difficult for students to gain knowledge outside their fixed curriculum. To exemplify, there are numerous amounts of video lessons available for a student who wish to learn any musical instrument. Before internet, the only way of doing this was to hire an instructor but now, the students can learn even from various professional who have pursued their career in music.
On the other hand, these benefits are targeted at boosting the knowledge that any student can get, but not to replace the entire system of education. Internet is perfused with lots of materials and unwanted content that tends to attract student attention and distract them. One of such instances are the advertisement that is available over the internet. Often the educational websites have ads associated, such as movies or new upcoming games which attracts the student’s attention. Thus, it completely depends on the usage of these technologies which can determine whether they can be helpful or distractive.
In essence, I agree that there is an incomparable advantage provided with the innovation of technologies like video, computer and internet for education of students. However, if there is uncontrolled access to everything available on the internet, this boon of science can affect adversely to the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
...tructor but now, the students can learn even from various professional who have purs...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2453.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41501103753 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92781649193 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518763796909 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7948188582 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.65 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235719033117 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749140520418 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486502483021 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137768508401 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308282329083 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.