Essay topic 34: Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Essay topic 34: Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Government has a vital role in managing a society but perhaps promoting growth is one of the main purposes of any government. It is undeniable that the development and progress of modern world have been made by the scientific community. Although it is important for a government to devote fund to the scientific research with vague outcomes, I concede that the government should spend money on the scientific studies with high demand and clear-cut consequences.

To begin with, the advances of various aspects of science such as medicine depend on the demand of society. For instance, there are various types of vaccines available these days which have been developed from Small pox, Polio and hepatitis. As these diseases were considered fatal in the past, there has been an integral need for scientists to begin doing research to find out the treatments. Another example of scientific development is the privilege of international flights and cell phones due to rapid growing global economy in the 1900’s. Such progresses have been feasible because of purposeful scientific researches in consistent with the demands of society. Thus, funding the goal oriented and demanding scientific experiments will help to recognize the areas that provide not only optimal increase in beneficial scientific development but also meet the needs of a society rather than funding every research proposal.

In addition, science is a platform of practicality and experimentation which is most likely based on probability and chance. There are various areas yet to be scrutinized such as treatments of epidemics, global warming, education and other acute issues. To do the scientific research in such scopes requires financial support and if the finance is invested in abortive experiments, it would result in loss of money, time and efforts which could have been spent on fruitful researches and advancement of human’s life in general.

In contrast, one may argue that a research does not need a clear purpose to benefit society. Some scientific advances occurred based on scientific assumptions and knowledge pursuant that result in positive outcomes with significant impact throughout the world. One good example of this is Watson and Crrick’s discovery of the DNA helix structure which considerably contributed to the field of modern molecular engineering in producing and recycling natural energy. Thomas Edison invented the electronic light bulb and many other electronic devices which formed the rudiments for the development of high-tech devices accordingly. Hence, such advancement also needs to be supported at least by private institutions under the supervision of governments so as to motivate the researches and flourish the science. If they are not sponsored, either would they abandon research or would wicked purposes individuals abuse their ideas.

In conclusion, governments should allocate funds to scientific research which are demanding and incumbent to meet the society’s needs. However, other areas of research should be supported by private centers under the control of government to avoid any ill-intentioned plans.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-06 pooja.kakde@gmail.com 58 view
2019-12-06 pooja.kakde@gmail.com 16 view
2019-11-01 Vaibhav Panchal 50 view
2019-10-13 sayali7 83 view
2019-10-13 08sandip 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Persian Moonlight :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 33, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...l. In contrast, one may argue that a research does not need a clear purpose to benefi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 756, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ns under the supervision of governments so as to motivate the researches and flourish th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, as to, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2683.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55486542443 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0458026926 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3867138004 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.15 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.15 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195569512633 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603491653276 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465787072264 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125885833681 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369920382845 0.0667264976115 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.