Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would eous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The government plays a vital role in managing societies but main purpose of the government is to promote the growth of the scientific community. Scientific community is only responsible for the development and progress in the modern world. Some researches do not have their impact for now, but surely they can be used in the future somewhere. Therefore, the government should fund any scientific research even to those whose consequences are unclear.
To begin with, scientific research in the field of medicine has a severe impact on our lives. For instance, nowadays vaccines are available in a wide variety such as polio, smallpox, hepatitis. However, in earlier days these vaccines were not available and hence there is no medium for people to cure and hence these results in deaths of people. In addition to that, science is a platform for practicality and experimentation and is likely based on probability and chance. And without experiments, nothing can be achieved.
In addition, there are lots and lots of young minds that can be beneficial to science through research but if the government does not give funds for them then they might be discouraged beforehand. Sometimes scientific research produces a result that cannot be used immediately, for instance, Albert Einstein's, the world's famous scientist, who wrote lots of research papers that were considered useless by many people. But, roughly after 50 years of that, LASER was invented based on the same principle devised by Einstein. Also, there are lots of fields in science that are yet to be scrutinized, such as, epidemics, global warming, education, and other issues. Moreover, all this requires financial support, if the government does not give funds for this, researches will not progress further.
Coupled with good research there have been some possible scenarios where research can produce undesirable results, such as the generation of viruses, or weapons of mass destruction. Despite this, they urge us to make double our efforts to develop a technology that will overpower these negative impacts. Far more medicines are developed than that of the viruses. Diseases that were incurable before decades, for example, Cancer, can be treated very easily today.
In conclusion, the governments should give funds to all the scientific research, even if their consequences are unclear because even failures in research will provides an astute sense of judgment about the possibilities we should consider and the ones we should not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | pooja.kakde@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Vaibhav Panchal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | sayali7 | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | 08sandip | 50 | view |
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 82
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 55
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- settlement of the Chaco Canyon 73
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 160, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... because even failures in research will provides an astute sense of judgment about the p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32330827068 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83522791782 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568922305764 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6511542544 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.789473684 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19765121889 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631734902044 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672825687473 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121134565985 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649541191302 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.