govermnment oficials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out will of the people they serve
Here author is concerned with judicial judgment in favor of public by government officials, which is entirely based on own view. And suggesting it should not be according to will of people they serve.
Here I will elaborate more by being concern to republic rule rather than for democratic because claim sound quite plausible to that rule. In any republic country leader is choose by people, to work for people for their betterment. But people on power is responsible to serve every one by being disinterested. So it is overt that no one can give any decision based on the contingent view.
Although it is equally true that people are selecting leader for solving their problems they are facing. If people of particular area facing problem regarding to affluence coming from near by industry , and they are putting plea for closing for particular company, but at same time government is having big benefits from company in term if taxes.
If such condition is not so sever and alternatives are available to mitigate effect of chemical, in such way that company can be benefit in terms of large term employment of that area, then government officials have to see wide view of problem instead of giving decision in favor of people they serve. There can be more events at international and national level In which wide view of problem is to be analyzed then decision is to be concluded. Some time some corrupted officers can give decision in their own favor or merely for purpose of vote to get elected in next session also but it is not reasonable. Decision must be based on general welfare of people containing large group.
In conclusion I would say that to give any decision is rather subjective matter then solving problem of few people and need some wide research.
- competition for high grades seriously limiting the quality of learning at all levels of education. 58
- law should be flexible enough to take account of various circusmtances , times , and places 16
- an innovative treatment has come to our attention that promices to significantly reduce absenteeeism inour school andworkplace. a study reports that in nearby east meria, whwre fish consumption is very high, people visit once or twice fortreatment of cold 41
- in some countries, television ad radio programs are carefully censored for offensive language and behavior. in other countries, there or no censorship 58
- young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goal rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...rule. In any republic country leader is choose by people, to work for people for thei...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is choose by people, to work for people for their betterment. But people on powe...
^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on the contingent view. Although it is equally true that people are selecting l...
^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng problem regarding to affluence coming from near by industry , and they are pu...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...lem regarding to affluence coming from near by industry , and they are putting plea f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... affluence coming from near by industry , and they are putting plea for closing ...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coming from near by industry , and they are putting plea for closing for particu...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for particular company, but at same time government is having big benefits from c...
^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits from company in term if taxes. If such condition is not so sever and alter...
^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...natives are available to mitigate effect of chemical, in such way that company c...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te effect of chemical, in such way that company can be benefit in terms of large...
^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew of problem instead of giving decision in favor of people they serve. There ca...
^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...giving decision in favor of people they serve. There can be more events at inter...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o give any decision is rather subjective matter then solving problem of few peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n solving problem of few people and need some wide research.
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240740740741 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.194444444444 0.157235817809 124% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0987654320988 0.0880659088768 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0555555555556 0.0497285424764 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0401234567901 0.0444667217837 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.172839506173 0.12292977631 141% => OK
Participles: 0.0740740740741 0.0406280797675 182% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.6065897032 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.037037037037 0.030933414821 120% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.033950617284 0.0997080785238 34% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0277777777778 0.0249443105267 111% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00617283950617 0.0148568991511 42% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1785.0 2732.02544248 65% => OK
No of words: 306.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83333333333 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339869281046 0.366273622748 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.248366013072 0.280924506359 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173202614379 0.200843997647 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107843137255 0.132149295362 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6065897032 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52614379085 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 53.8238647471 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5384615385 23.380412469 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4170101268 59.4972553346 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.307692308 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 23.380412469 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.538461538462 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.21349557522 288% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 48.3750628457 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.68085106383 1.64882698954 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196618762374 0.391690518653 50% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132907518072 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.073324200306 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.616671483774 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172729038583 0.149214159877 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931574584178 0.161403998019 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050365376884 0.0892212321368 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267676472302 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0502839055956 0.0692045440612 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131167732723 0.275328986314 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567705385533 0.0653680567796 87% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.