government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive
The author of the topic states an assertion the government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. While some may argue that this statement holds true all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
Major cities are the backbone of every country, as they provide employment to a lot of people, a major contributor to the country's economy. These cities contribute more to GDP as compared to others and having more amenities when compared to others. They are the dream cities for many not only across the country but across the globe because you will get much more as one could get in their city. And all this cannot be possible without government financial support.
Investors from all over the world try to invest in major cities of any country. Many people come from various places in the country in search of employment, as they will get a lot of opportunities. They are the hub for various MNC and most of the startups were started there only or begin to start, for Example, California is among the major cities of the USA and most of the startups that are now a big giant in the corporate world were started there only like Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc. For a country to make its major cities popular among the tourist, investors, the government has to provide financial support to them so they can thrive.
Providing financial assistance to these cities does not mean focus on them only and doing nothing for others. Yes, the government has to focus more on these cities as they are contributing more to the growth of a country in various ways, but they also try to make other cities of a country as their major one. And for this, they have to focus on others also, by providing financial support to them, for example, the GDP of California alone is around 2 trillion dollars alone, which is more than the many countries in the world, but the USA is not only focusing alone on California, they try to make others state like California.
Whenever we heard any country name, the first thing that comes into our mind is their major countries, for example, if we talk about the USA the name that came's into mid is California or New York, not even the capital. So, we can also say that a country is known for its major cities and its government duty to make them world class and famous by providing them financial support.
In conclusion, governments should focus on major cities because financial help from the government will definitely help cities, which in turn will help the government itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | Vivi5428 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years. 58
- those who make the decision on the basis of their emotion and then justify them tend to be poor decision-maker. 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 50
- technology 58
- eople's behavior is largely determined by external forces, not to their own making. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...he globe because you will get much more as one could get in their city. And all th...
^^
Line 18, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, which is more than the many countries in the world, but the USA is not only fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76826722338 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40014513096 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436325678497 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.509827044 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.352941176 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1764705882 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392351488911 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147968879975 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167794466959 0.0758088955206 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215644611269 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819375624273 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.