Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In comparison with peripheral areas, a claim that it would be more desirable to give priority to major cities in terms of financial support. The supporters believed that supporting such cities would be more lucrative for generating greater wealth.
Indeed, financial support for poorer cities would be less likely to generate income. Given that the smaller cities are usually less talents, the money that the whole country reserved for such cities are less likely to be used in the efficient way as major cities, in the case that majority of talents resident in cosmopolitans. Furthermore, usually major cities have more connection with global maket, whcih enables them potential to get earn money in channels that other cities cannot have.
However, this view may be criticised from view of equity that such opine would increase the gap between the major cities and the rest, which would exacerbate the income eqality. In most case, citizens in peripherial cities are lives with fewer income and poorer infranstructure including healthcare, education and transportation. This makes their demand for financial support more urgent than those in major cities, and they deserve the priority for financial support.
Even at such rebuttle, the government should safevouch major cities financial support at the belief that the major cities could give rise to the economy to those smaller cities. The supporters would claim that the spillover from the financial support to major cities would have strong impact on smaller cities, just like how Shenzhen, helped establish the economy of its vinvinity after being established as Special Administrative Region and safegared its financial support from the central goverment. Then its well-established infrastructure such as hospital, education resorces, and financial industry could also be beneficial for the nearby areas and even the whole country.
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- Teachers salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 67
- The following memorandum is from the president of Primo Doll Manufacturing Inc According to a survey last year of parents who purchased the Elkie our most popular doll 90 percent reported that although their children were extremely satisfied with the doll 63
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
In comparison with peripheral areas, a claim that it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun talents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ven that the smaller cities are usually less talents, the money that the whole count...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, so, then, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48122866894 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73780558982 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518771331058 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1864697888 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247019932485 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117037221103 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488754769307 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173241922963 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00896128933441 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
In comparison with peripheral areas, a claim that it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun talents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ven that the smaller cities are usually less talents, the money that the whole count...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, so, then, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48122866894 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73780558982 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518771331058 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1864697888 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247019932485 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117037221103 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488754769307 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173241922963 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00896128933441 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.