Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The proportion of autonomy a government should possess is not an inconsequential one. It is rather a complex and crucial issue. Government officials are the ones responsible for the reforms and legislatures of a country. They have the burden to make the most fortuitous decision. The prosperity of a country is dependent on the decision-making skills of its government. A major issue is how autonomous a government should be. Should a government just use their rationality to make the decision, or should they do what the people want? It’s a simplistic view that it should be one or the other. It is a bit of both. Government officials should mostly consider the will of the people whom they serve but at times should take decisions which is best for their country.
To begin with, a completely autonomous government will end up abusing their power. They will start taking decisions which are propitious for them, not the people, not their country. To illustrate, let’s consider country A where the government is completely autonomous. The elected government has been endorsed by company B. A reform in the legislature is needed which will be beneficial for the people but will decrease the profits of company B. The lobbyists of company B will influence the government to not reform the bill and the government will oblige in hopes for further endorsement. The government and company B will thrive, while the people and country B will suffer.
In addition, the high officials live a comfortable life. They do not live in the same locality or conditions ordinary people live in. They fail to understand the problems ordinary people face daily. The higher up the officials are, the farther they are from the realities of the people. For example, a government official living in a house with 24/7 supply of utilities like electricity, gas and water won’t understand the importance of establishing power stations for a locality with frequent load-shedding. The people within a locality where there’s no power for 12 hours a day will push for a solution. But the government official won’t consider this a big deal and delay this proposition. But had a vote be taken for the proposition acceptance, the people could have solved their problem.
In contrast, some may argue that people may in fact not know what’s best for them. They might end up choosing the wrong choice if given the opportunity to choose. Also, the lobbyist failing to influence government may end up influencing the people. In these situations, the government should take decisions based on their own rationality instead of listening to the people. But this is mostly not the case. A co-operative relationship is needed between the government and the people rather than a fully autonomous government. The government should consider both their cognition and the will of the people before making a decision.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms Of the advertising 60
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06498951782 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95188321725 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454926624738 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 18.0 4.99550561798 360% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6069178934 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.90625 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368894140577 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973032315074 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718099345218 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239136895328 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509077793304 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.